I started racing triathlon sprints a couple years back and immediately thought my plan was to race an Olympic next and then on to a Half Ironman. I Honestly sort of felt that it was the expectation. Who just races sprints after all? Isn't that like only running 5Ks and never enjoying the glory of the longer races?
I was on the verge of signing up for a HIM for the following year when I had a conversation with my bike fitter, who is a front-pack swimmer and a fantastic cyclist. After learning that I had 3 young children at home, he asked "how do you even have time for this?" I told him all I had raced up until that point were sprints, but that I was planning on ramping up the distance. He immediately said "Let me ask you something. How much time can you put into training?" I replied that I try to soak up my time with my kids as much as possible, so at most an hour Mon-Sat. and maybe a 2-hour run/workout on Sunday. Basically, no more than I was already doing (at least until my kids were older and didnât want to spend time with me!). His response: âYou can do whatever you want and there are plenty of people racing longer distances without putting in lots of time, but my advice is to race what youâve trained for. Thereâs nothing wrong with racing sprints.â
I think this is the point where I realized the only reason I wanted to sign up for longer races is because I assumed thatâs what everyone did and that I might even be judged if I did otherwise, which is admittedly a bit immature. I was certainly not looking to increase my training time, especially after experiencing the training that comes along with a marathon where I miss weekend time with my kids on the longer runs. So 8 sprints later, and signed up for 5 more, and I have yet to experience an Olympic. I still feel like an odd one out, but it works well for me and I place relatively well for a casual triathlon dad since my training aligns with my race distance (USAT score 75 â like I said, âRELATIVELYâ). I do have plans to shift to Olympic, but HIMs will just have to wait until further down the road.
So, how have you all chosen your race distances?
I was on the verge of signing up for a HIM for the following year when I had a conversation with my bike fitter, who is a front-pack swimmer and a fantastic cyclist. After learning that I had 3 young children at home, he asked "how do you even have time for this?" I told him all I had raced up until that point were sprints, but that I was planning on ramping up the distance. He immediately said "Let me ask you something. How much time can you put into training?" I replied that I try to soak up my time with my kids as much as possible, so at most an hour Mon-Sat. and maybe a 2-hour run/workout on Sunday. Basically, no more than I was already doing (at least until my kids were older and didnât want to spend time with me!). His response: âYou can do whatever you want and there are plenty of people racing longer distances without putting in lots of time, but my advice is to race what youâve trained for. Thereâs nothing wrong with racing sprints.â
I think this is the point where I realized the only reason I wanted to sign up for longer races is because I assumed thatâs what everyone did and that I might even be judged if I did otherwise, which is admittedly a bit immature. I was certainly not looking to increase my training time, especially after experiencing the training that comes along with a marathon where I miss weekend time with my kids on the longer runs. So 8 sprints later, and signed up for 5 more, and I have yet to experience an Olympic. I still feel like an odd one out, but it works well for me and I place relatively well for a casual triathlon dad since my training aligns with my race distance (USAT score 75 â like I said, âRELATIVELYâ). I do have plans to shift to Olympic, but HIMs will just have to wait until further down the road.
So, how have you all chosen your race distances?