cyclenutnz wrote:
I applaud DB for what they've tried to do here. But it's really not looking like there is much benefit at the yaw angles that matter compared to a 4 year old superbike. And I'd really want to see rider-on data for a bike like this.
Additionally - the choice of Hed bars doesn't help the fit range, so the utility of this bike is rather hampered, no matter how much stuff it can carry.
I wonder if the next Cervelo improved on the P5 to the same degree if everyone would be falling all over themselves that the new model is faster? Also notable that this shows a disc brake bike that's faster than a rim brake bike, heresy as that may be in the ST world.
Also worth noting is this copy from the paper:
Instead of adapting a bike from another purpose, we’re taking a gamble to cater to a relatively small group of racers who are looking for more out of their bikes. We are confident the results will be undeniable.
In other words, they don't plan to sell a lot of these. Seems their target audience is long course triathletes, they generally ride at somewhat slower speeds which gain more benefit from high yaw. Also they ride in more relaxed positions so the fit range and bar also is more appropriate.
Also have to consider that given the "small group" that this is aimed at, this may be a "halo" bike intended to enhance their brand and help drive sales of more conventional models. I wonder if their development costs were kept in check by using a bunch of grad students for a lot of the design, and use of a half scale tunnel which saved costs on prototyping.
Personally, this bike won't make my list to consider for my next bike but I really applaud their out of the box thinking and innovation. Lots of interesting stuff happening, looking to see what might come from Cannondale & Cervelo next.