Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [gunsbuns] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
gunsbuns wrote:
Phelps is arguably the greatest swimmer of all time BUT he wasn't within cooee of ever being an elite distance freestyle swimmer. Anyway, had he tried to do the same, maybe he could have. The fact is he didn't (as far as we know). Vendt did - lots of witnesses - and the guy who set the set and took the times says it happened as posted. His exact words! I only took out the ''Hi Mitch'. You and others here might do a bit of triathlon and dabble in swimming but the guy telling the tale has coached a guy to Olympic silver behind..... Phelps!

Just want to address the above about Phelps not being an elite distance swimmer. He dabbled in the 400 free and was going under 3:50 in season. Because he didn't do it any opinion is as valid as the next but I think Phelps would have been under 14:45 if the 1500 had been his focus.
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [gunsbuns] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
gunsbuns wrote:
His words taken from an email so he could have been reading from an old book. My experience with many coaches though is that their memory for splits of swimmers past far exceeds even their memory of birthdays and anniversaries. But I shall ask him in person. I'm sure he'll be amused at all the 'expert' swimming coaches out there who are saying it couldn't be done and his recollection is wrong.

Surely in the absence of disputing evidence such as a video, or scientific proof that it's physiologically not possible, the jury would have to accept the testimony of the acknowledged expert (the coach) who has a clean record, no priors, and who says on oath - this is the true version!

Guns - Thanks for being the link to the real source of this extremely epic set!!!


"Anyone can be who they want to be IF they have the HUNGER and the DRIVE."
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [gunsbuns] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
gunsbuns wrote:
His words taken from an email so he could have been reading from an old book. My experience with many coaches though is that their memory for splits of swimmers past far exceeds even their memory of birthdays and anniversaries. But I shall ask him in person. I'm sure he'll be amused at all the 'expert' swimming coaches out there who are saying it couldn't be done and his recolection is wrong.

Surely in the absence of disputing evidence such as a video, or scientific proof that it's physiologicaly not possible, the jury would have to accept the testimony of the acknowledged expert (the coach) who has a clean record, no priors, and who says on oath - this is the true version!

You don't spend much time on a swim deck. There is sometimes a guy who can tell you what so and so split on this relay or on this set or at this meet. That guy isn't usually the head coach. And a 4:24 500 freestyler is not remotely good enough to perform the set as you described.
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [hiro11] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
hiro11 wrote:
ericmulk wrote:
And Carey was mainly known as a backstroker:) Also, did you not mean in the early 80s, rather than 90s???
You're thinking Rick Carey. I'm talking about Ray Carey:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Carey_%28swimmer%29

EDIT: sorry, just noticed people above already answered this. Also, as far as I know the Careys are not related. I grew up swimming against Ray.

Ya, I was getting my R. Carey's mixed up. Interesting that they are not related. Did you ever talk to him after the '96 Games??? I'll bet he was bummed to have swum 3.4 sec slower in the Games than in the Trials, but OTOH, he made it all the way to the oly games, which is pretty huge:)


"Anyone can be who they want to be IF they have the HUNGER and the DRIVE."
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [ajthomas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ajthomas wrote:
gunsbuns wrote:
Phelps is arguably the greatest swimmer of all time BUT he wasn't within cooee of ever being an elite distance freestyle swimmer. Anyway, had he tried to do the same, maybe he could have. The fact is he didn't (as far as we know). Vendt did - lots of witnesses - and the guy who set the set and took the times says it happened as posted. His exact words! I only took out the ''Hi Mitch'. You and others here might do a bit of triathlon and dabble in swimming but the guy telling the tale has coached a guy to Olympic silver behind..... Phelps!

Just want to address the above about Phelps not being an elite distance swimmer. He dabbled in the 400 free and was going under 3:50 in season. Because he didn't do it any opinion is as valid as the next but I think Phelps would have been under 14:45 if the 1500 had been his focus.

400 free for men is really Middle distance but it would be hard to argue that the greatest Olympian (No of gold) of all time who was pretty handy at 400IM couldn't have been a top distance swimmer had he wanted to. I wouldn't even argue that he could do the Vendt set if he set his mind to it. Put the two of them next to each other and they may have got to 40! Would have been an epic battle to see who got dropped first. I'd love to throw Grant Hackett in the third lane as well. You could watch the start for an hour or so, wonder off, have a meal and come back to watch the battle. That's one training set that would tantalise.
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [ajthomas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ajthomas wrote:
gunsbuns wrote:
His words taken from an email so he could have been reading from an old book. My experience with many coaches though is that their memory for splits of swimmers past far exceeds even their memory of birthdays and anniversaries. But I shall ask him in person. I'm sure he'll be amused at all the 'expert' swimming coaches out there who are saying it couldn't be done and his recolection is wrong.

Surely in the absence of disputing evidence such as a video, or scientific proof that it's physiologicaly not possible, the jury would have to accept the testimony of the acknowledged expert (the coach) who has a clean record, no priors, and who says on oath - this is the true version!

You don't spend much time on a swim deck. There is sometimes a guy who can tell you what so and so split on this relay or on this set or at this meet. That guy isn't usually the head coach. And a 4:24 500 freestyler is not remotely good enough to perform the set as you described.

Nope, your right. Watched more training sessions than I care to remember over the last 14 or 15 years (only because I actually enjoy watching and learning) and In competition I'm always up in the stands (or bleachers as you guys say) and with the electronic timing and big screens, everyone can see what the splits are. I'm pretty good at remembering my kids times but not splits and was a bit of a wiz working out relay splits so other parents would know. But I don't get the reference to me as I'm not the coach and this isn't MY TRUTH.

Every coach I've ever come across managed very well with their swimmers splits so not sure who must have coached you (bad experience maybe?) and I know most usually also do stroke rates so that's two measurements they are mostly pretty good at.

I'm just trying to pass on what most informed people would accept as the likely accurate description of a set that has had different versions. The version I've given isn't mine, it's his coach. I'm not losing any sleep if you don't believe his coach or if you believe or don't believe in the tooth fairy, the Easter bunny or Santa.
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [ajthomas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think a question is when he did the 4:24, was it at a shaved and tapered meet? Both the 1997 and 1998 Spring Nationals were LCM, not SCY. So the question to me is whether he ever same a 500 in his high school years when he was actually rested for it.

For sake of argument, here are his results from '97 and '98 Spring Nationals:
'97: As a 16 year old
800FR: 8:25.05
400FR: 4:01.97
1500FR: 15:57.52

'98: As a 17 year old
800FR: 8:03.46
400IM: 4:23.19
400FR: 3:54.44 Which converts to a 4:22.67 500scy. So chances are he was faster than his best SCY 500 time.
1500FR: 15:30.65
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [gunsbuns] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
gunsbuns wrote:
ajthomas wrote:

You don't spend much time on a swim deck. There is sometimes a guy who can tell you what so and so split on this relay or on this set or at this meet. That guy isn't usually the head coach. And a 4:24 500 freestyler is not remotely good enough to perform the set as you described.


Nope, your right. Watched more training sessions than I care to remember over the last 14 or 15 years (only because I actually enjoy watching and learning) and In competition I'm always up in the stands (or bleachers as you guys say) and with the electronic timing and big screens, everyone can see what the splits are. I'm pretty good at remembering my kids times but not splits and was a bit of a wiz working out relay splits so other parents would know. But I don't get the reference to me as I'm not the coach and this isn't MY TRUTH.

Exactly my point. Apparently it is you who is that guy on your pool deck. You know more about splits than the coach and it means more to you than the coach. Which is why the coach has no idea what he is talking about. I am that guy too. Take it as a compliment. You know more about the truth on this than Josh. Well, as soon as you see the light!
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [rcs430] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rcs430 wrote:
I think a question is when he did the 4:24, was it at a shaved and tapered meet? Both the 1997 and 1998 Spring Nationals were LCM, not SCY. So the question to me is whether he ever same a 500 in his high school years when he was actually rested for it.

For sake of argument, here are his results from '97 and '98 Spring Nationals:
'97: As a 16 year old
800FR: 8:25.05
400FR: 4:01.97
1500FR: 15:57.52

'98: As a 17 year old
800FR: 8:03.46
400IM: 4:23.19
400FR: 3:54.44 Which converts to a 4:22.67 500scy. So chances are he was faster than his best SCY 500 time.
1500FR: 15:30.65

Vendt was better at LCM but I am not going to quibble over 4:24 or 4:22 or 4:20. Either way the point is the swimmer who is alleged to have performed this set wasn't even true world class at the time.
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [ajthomas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
World beater at the time, no, I agree with that. Looking back at the results now, what I find most impressive is his consistent progression, he never really leveled out. Within two years he's breaking 15min for the 1500 and racing to Silver behind Dolan in the 400IM. I think one of the things that made Erik special was the mentality that he had, I don't think sets like 30x1000 phased him mentally, I think he loved that stuff.

As I mentioned above, I know he did 30 - that I remember. His actual splits and times, couldn't tell you, was busy in our own workout and him doing extraordinary things in practice was pretty normal. Could I believe he did those times, yes, if only because of what we saw from him everyday, to the point I think a lot of us took it for granted.
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [gunsbuns] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
"You could watch the start for an hour or so, wonder off, have a meal and come back to watch the battle."

Is that what those "lots of witnesses" you mentioned above did? Wandered off and came back hours later?
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [mattbk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Only because Potts doesn't have much experience swimming on feet ;) At IM Hawaii 2009 Flanagan/Potts went 47:42/47:45 swimming next to each other...neither wanted to drop back to take feet. Hell, they could have gone much faster taking turns pulling… //


I think you need to go back and take a look at this race. As i recall Potts sat on his feet virtually the entire way. Flanagan was going for the record and Potts was stretched to stay on his feet most of the time, but never in any real danger of getting popped. But it was fast enough that every once in awhile you could see potts fade back just a bit off the feet, but then recover pretty quickly. Looked like a textbook case of perfect drafting as far as i could tell. And andy has swam in the pack on several occasions, when it suits his overall race plan.. He has no trouble swimming onto someones bubbles...


Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [gregn] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Look, final comments

1. rcs430 was there and he confirms the set happened. He was in the pool training at the time.
He says: "So does the pace and times surprise me, no, Erik thrived on those types of sets. "
"Really just want to point out that I think it's possible",
"when it came to training sets with Erik, nothing really surprises me."
and finally "Do I know he did the set, yes, I remember that. Can I say with absolutely certainly all the details, nope, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were accurate."

2. So with respect, unless someone has a better direct relationship or understanding of this swimmer (eg was in his squad like rcs) or was there on the day and was taking splits (AJThomas?) and disputes this, then I think we have to give his opinion a little more weight than every other poster to this thread.

3. Josh was there and he was the coach. He confirmed it happened and he gave his version of how, why and some colour (food intake etc). He has zero to gain by embellishing. He does not strike me as a 'bragger', in fact he's the opposite.

4.Coaches take splits. They always do! It sounds like only two people in the world were likely there for the whole 5 hrs because as rcs says, the rest of the squad came in later - and one of those two was pretty busy swimming.

All this means that there is likely only one person who knows what the go times and splits were

AND that ladies and gentlemen is,,,,, the coach!

It's not really a big deal to me - I just wanted to take an opportunity to share the details of an interesting story that has graced the internet and has a few different versions. I know Josh reasonably well and I believe him
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [ajthomas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ajthomas wrote:
But what I really was trying to say is that a lot of biking and running slows you down in the water!

^ so much of this.

"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [gunsbuns] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
gunsbuns wrote:
Look, final comments
1. rcs430 was there and he confirms the set happened. He was in the pool training at the time.
He says: "So does the pace and times surprise me, no, Erik thrived on those types of sets. "
"Really just want to point out that I think it's possible",
"when it came to training sets with Erik, nothing really surprises me."
and finally "Do I know he did the set, yes, I remember that. Can I say with absolutely certainly all the details, nope, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were accurate."
2. So with respect, unless someone has a better direct relationship or understanding of this swimmer (eg was in his squad like rcs) or was there on the day and was taking splits (AJThomas?) and disputes this, then I think we have to give his opinion a little more weight than every other poster to this thread.
3. Josh was there and he was the coach. He confirmed it happened and he gave his version of how, why and some colour (food intake etc). He has zero to gain by embellishing. He does not strike me as a 'bragger', in fact he's the opposite.
4.Coaches take splits. They always do! It sounds like only two people in the world were likely there for the whole 5 hrs because as rcs says, the rest of the squad came in later - and one of those two was pretty busy swimming.
All this means that there is likely only one person who knows what the go times and splits were
AND that ladies and gentlemen is,,,,, the coach!
It's not really a big deal to me - I just wanted to take an opportunity to share the details of an interesting story that has graced the internet and has a few different versions. I know Josh reasonably well and I believe him.

Guns - Nice summary; regardless of the dispute on the details, thanks for posting this thread to start with. Very interesting:)


"Anyone can be who they want to be IF they have the HUNGER and the DRIVE."
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [gunsbuns] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Link where another guy says he heard directly from Stern what the set was and (of course) it isn't what you posted:

http://d3swimming.com/...;t=5985&start=15
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [ajthomas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
And your Point?
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [monty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I disnt witness the workout, but I did swim with some world class swimmers. This doesn't strike me as untrue.

When I swam I saw guys on the team who were training for the 25k world championships at the time swim 25k+ in a workout while pulling a 20 gallon bucket behind them with a hole in the bottom. And still swimming fast. There is a reason they call them world class athletes.

http://www.magnoliamasters.com
http://www.snappingtortuga.com
http://www.swimeasyspeed.com
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [ajthomas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ajthomas wrote:
JasoninHalifax wrote:
Yeah, I get all that. I'm just not willing to say that the OP's version is definitely bullshit, because I've seen guys do some amazingly insane things over the years.

I think it is bullshit. Well more likely just an innocent case of getting faster as the story gets older. Keep in mind, Jason, that this set is alleged to have occurred when Erik was a teenager. He was "only" a 4:24 in HS when he was swimming for Stern.

"You know every guy on the basketball team had to run a mile under 5:30 or they got cut," says a friend of mine at the basketball game.
"You mean to tell me that that huge center. You know the clumsy one -who is what 7'2" ? and clearly 150 lbs over weight- the one who gets tired after standing under the basket? He ran a sub 5:30 mile?"
"Yeah it says so in the news paper. His coach wouldn't make that up."

You know we have to listen to football coaches make up ridiculous lies about how Super Blob Footballer X can out sprint Usain Bolt.

This is just minor exaggeration in comparison.
No doubt there is a lot of truth in here.
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [dre] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
dre wrote:
The toughest workout I ever heard of was 20 x 1,000 IM long course, not breaking stroke once. Not sure of the times, but it is impressive regardless.
Jerry Frentsos was a 1988 Olympic alternate in the 400 IM. 1987 his best time for the 400 IM was 4:26; He calculated that he needed to drop 6 seconds to qualify for the Olympics. He dropped 6 seconds and swam a 4:20 at trials. But when he touched the wall and looked up, he discovered that he was 3rd. He missed going to the Olympics by .18 seconds and became an alternate.
It took him 3 tries to finally complete that 20 x 1,000s IM workout and dropping 6 seconds in 1 year at that level is pretty much unheard of.

Looked up the 1988 Trials and you are absolutely correct as Frentsos finished 3rd in 4:20.41 behind Dave Wharton's 4:16.32 and Jeff Kostoff's 4:20.23. So, he had some really stiff competition in that event. IIRC, Wharton once did a 16,000 IM long course, and Kostoff did the 5 x 5000 scy on 50:00, so some extremely tough competition here:)


"Anyone can be who they want to be IF they have the HUNGER and the DRIVE."
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [ericmulk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My coach thought it would be fun to do a "animal set" back when I was 15 years. Old.

1000m Warm up, 500 Kick Smooth

20 X 800m. 8 Free, 4 IM order, 8 Free (alternate Pull Paddle). Took out team about 4.5 hours to finish it off. Still the hardest workout I have even done.
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [gunsbuns] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
GUNSBUNS,

Say hi to Josh from Dave D too. Tell him im still in boston coaching. Ill look for his old emails and hope they work. if they don't Ill give you mine and have him reach out please.

As for Erik and his training, if josh said he did it. Then Erik did it. I was with josh and erik for most of his lead up to Sydney... that kid is secretly a hero of mine.(erik and josh for that matter). Josh is an awesome coach and an even better person.

DaveD
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [monty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Hmm...I may have been remembering Potts and Sansone when they swam side by side. Now I remember Potts not going for the swim prime too hard since he took Jon's feet. Potts is on record saying he can't stand swimming on people feet and tries to avoid it...
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [ericmulk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ericmulk wrote:
Looked up the 1988 Trials and you are absolutely correct as Frentsos finished 3rd in 4:20.41 behind Dave Wharton's 4:16.32 and Jeff Kostoff's 4:20.23. So, he had some really stiff competition in that event. IIRC, Wharton once did a 16,000 IM long course, and Kostoff did the 5 x 5000 scy on 50:00, so some extremely tough competition here:)

A bit off topic, but I hadn't known Jerry Frentsos was that close to making the Olympics. Last month I was at a local scm masters meet. The roads were terribly icy and it took me 1.5 hours to make the less than 20 mile drive to the meet. The meet was delayed in part because "some guy" was coming to try to break the WR in the M50-54 400 IM. It turns out it was Frentsos and he was coming from Maryland with his wife and kid. They got to within a mile of the pool and the road was blocked. So he left them there in the car and walked to the pool, had maybe 5-10 mins to warm up then was up on the blocks. He missed the record by about a second...but won Husband and Dad of the year award, ha.

I don't question Vendt's killer set. If his best 1000 time was 8:30-ish then doing 10 min ave send-offs doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility.

-leh
Quote Reply
Re: Erik Vendt 30 x 1000 - The True story [ajthomas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ajthomas wrote:
mattbk wrote:
ajthomas wrote:
There was a post about who you would like to see race an IM, I think I mentioned Vendt. There is no question he would be an elite pro within a short amount of time.

Drop the elite guys? Of course. To give you an idea: at a ow race a year and a half ago Vendt beat Sara McClary by 1:30 in a one mile swim. McClarty is typically within 30 seconds - sometimes closer - of the best male splits in Olympic distance races. If the race stretched to 2.4 miles the gap would be pretty big. My guess is that he would beat Potts by 3:30 on a 2.4 mile swim right now.


Only because Potts doesn't have much experience swimming on feet ;) At IM Hawaii 2009 Flanagan/Potts went 47:42/47:45 swimming next to each other...neither wanted to drop back to take feet. Hell, they could have gone much faster taking turns pulling...


The main difference between Vendt and Flanangan/Potts is that Vendt is a swimmer (he is still a swimmer FYI I hear he might take a stab at the 10K ). When Flanagan was a "swimmer" in 2008 he beat Potts by quite a bit at Kona (48:40 / 47:02). When he turned pro triathlete the next year he couldn't out swim him. It is difficult to compare years and who knows what Potts would have done in '07 had Flanagan been there.

But what I really was trying to say is that a lot of biking and running slows you down in the water!

That 47:02 was awesome, but there was a former pro OWS (Noa Sakamoto) who went 47:01 with Flanagan that day...and those 2 were leading the AG swim, but were swimming through the pro wakes, while Potts was out front with fresh undisturbed water... I'm sure those 2 were going for the fastest swim they could reasonably manage that day...
Quote Reply

Prev Next