Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires"
Quote | Reply
Looking at biketechreview's data on Crr, does the aero advantages of the Bontrager or Zipp tires outweigh lower Crr values of other tires. I know aero trumps all, but have these gains been tested and are they significant enough to overcome the Crr values of other tires.
Thanks in advance.

Who Dares...Wins!
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [+4W/Kg] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Short answer: "good" tires (the two you mentioned qualify) with latex tubes at the appropriate pressure in the appropriate width for your wheelset will yield the fastest results.

In general, narrower is better. As are slightly oval shapes and higher thread counts (again, both tires you mention have these).
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [+4W/Kg] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
depends on how fast youre going. when in doubt stick with lower crr
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [bpq] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
so in latest triathlete mag they conclude:

wider is better: 25 is better than 23 or 21

lower thread counts are better

they do agree latex is better...

i personally think 23 corvo or tangente clinchers with hq latex tubes is the way to go...

Randy Christofferson(http://www.rcmioga.blogspot.com

Insert Doubt. Erase Hope. Crush Dreams.
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [rcmioga] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
lower thread counts are better


Is that a typo? I thought higher thread count- more supple tires- were faster.

Suffer Well.
Last edited by: jmh: Jun 14, 11 19:05
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [rcmioga] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
rcmioga wrote:
so in latest triathlete mag they conclude:

wider is better: 25 is better than 23 or 21

lower thread counts are better

they do agree latex is better...

i personally think 23 corvo or tangente clinchers with hq latex tubes is the way to go...

I'd love to see that. Is it available online somewhere? Is "the latest" issue the swimsuit one?


"100% of the people who confuse correlation and causation end up dying."
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [jmh] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
latest issue--swimsuit

Randy Christofferson(http://www.rcmioga.blogspot.com

Insert Doubt. Erase Hope. Crush Dreams.
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [rcmioga] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
they conclude that wider is better but not for any good reason.

rcmioga wrote:
so in latest triathlete mag they conclude:

wider is better: 25 is better than 23 or 21

lower thread counts are better

they do agree latex is better...

i personally think 23 corvo or tangente clinchers with hq latex tubes is the way to go...



Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [+4W/Kg] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Aero isn't always better. A slight advantage in aero can be offset by a big advantage in Crr, comfort , durability, etc..

That said I think the only proven aero benefit of most tires is narrow and the aerowings. Even the narrow wings seems dependant on the rim. Filling the gap with caulk or sealant is possible on any7 tire.

The dimples seem somewhat dubious and the oval profile is also likely dependent on the rim width and tire wear.

In general I'd go for a narrow, low Crr tire. Those traits seem pretty universally good.

Styrrell

Styrrell
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [rcmioga] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I took at look at the article. I have a hard time reconciling the info in the article about moderate thread count tires being better than high thread count tires with the AFM rolling resistance chart.

As I recall the Specialized Mondo Open Tubular, with latex tubes, was the best clincher with the Bontrager Race X and R4, Veloflex Record, and Vittoria Corsa being near the top as well.

Perhaps it is just an intreptation of "moderate thread count," but those tires have 290TPI for the Specialized, 220TPI for both Bontragers, 350 TPI for the Veloflex and 320 for the Vittoria. I would consider 290 and above to be a very high TPI, 220 to be a high TPI, between 100 and 200 to be a moderate TPI and below 100 to be a low.

I thought the higher TPI tires, like the latex tubes, reduced rolling resistance because of the suppleness. Thoughts?

Suffer Well.
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [jmh] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I haven't read the article, but considering the source they are probably giving quite a bit of weight to robustness and comfort over all out speed.

When you are looking for fast tires, pay particular attentionb to width as measured. The Bontrager is low Crr but just a touch wider than optimal. Not sure if they are going to make a narrower version.

Styrrell

Styrrell
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [jmh] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I agree with you. I thought the aticle was at best unsupported and misrepresentative....

Randy Christofferson(http://www.rcmioga.blogspot.com

Insert Doubt. Erase Hope. Crush Dreams.
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [jmh] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
why even worry about any threadcount trends?
just look at the afm chart. if the tire is made of cement but tests fast, it is fast =)


jmh wrote:
I took at look at the article. I have a hard time reconciling the info in the article about moderate thread count tires being better than high thread count tires with the AFM rolling resistance chart.

As I recall the Specialized Mondo Open Tubular, with latex tubes, was the best clincher with the Bontrager Race X and R4, Veloflex Record, and Vittoria Corsa being near the top as well.

Perhaps it is just an intreptation of "moderate thread count," but those tires have 290TPI for the Specialized, 220TPI for both Bontragers, 350 TPI for the Veloflex and 320 for the Vittoria. I would consider 290 and above to be a very high TPI, 220 to be a high TPI, between 100 and 200 to be a moderate TPI and below 100 to be a low.

I thought the higher TPI tires, like the latex tubes, reduced rolling resistance because of the suppleness. Thoughts?



Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [styrrell] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
as I understand it the wings actually aren't proven to do anything, though it certainly looks like they would on some wheels.

it is supposedly the shape of the casing on the bontrager aero tires, and zipp tangente tires, that makes the aero difference.


styrrell wrote:
Aero isn't always better. A slight advantage in aero can be offset by a big advantage in Crr, comfort , durability, etc..

That said I think the only proven aero benefit of most tires is narrow and the aerowings. Even the narrow wings seems dependant on the rim. Filling the gap with caulk or sealant is possible on any7 tire.

The dimples seem somewhat dubious and the oval profile is also likely dependent on the rim width and tire wear.

In general I'd go for a narrow, low Crr tire. Those traits seem pretty universally good.

Styrrell



Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [jackmott] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jackmott wrote:
why even worry about any threadcount trends?
just look at the afm chart. if the tire is made of cement but tests fast, it is fast =)

The article is based upon a test... however no data shown just trends discussed and conclustions drawn. Next month they will have an article with the imporatance and impact of rim weight on speed with an equal amount of data.

Suffer Well.
Last edited by: jmh: Jun 15, 11 7:26
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [styrrell] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have some race data from 4 races that are telling me that the Bontrager Aero TT (23) is a better tire for me than the Vittoria Corsa CX (20) on my Hed Jet wheels (650's)

A little later this year I'll have some more comparisons when I repeat some races. Data would be available later today (when I get home) if anyone is interested.
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [jmh] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jmh wrote:
The article is based upon a test... however no data shown just trends discussed and conclustions drawn. Next month they will have an article with the imporatance and impact of rim weight on speed with an equal amount of data.

so...no data again? lol

awesome

will be good for my odds in cat4 races



Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [jackmott] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jackmott wrote:
jmh wrote:

The article is based upon a test... however no data shown just trends discussed and conclustions drawn. Next month they will have an article with the imporatance and impact of rim weight on speed with an equal amount of data.


so...no data again? lol

awesome

will be good for my odds in cat4 races

Gee, they could even include tire weight and recommend Tufos...
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [jaretj] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jaretj wrote:
I have some race data from 4 races that are telling me that the Bontrager Aero TT (23) is a better tire for me than the Vittoria Corsa CX (20) on my Hed Jet wheels (650's)

A little later this year I'll have some more comparisons when I repeat some races. Data would be available later today (when I get home) if anyone is interested.

I'm pretty sure this is consistent with what HED would tell you - specifically that it's the transition from tire to rim, and so matching tire width to their C2 rim width is the key variable.
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [jaretj] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm interested in what you find out later this year. jordan.witmer@gmail.com.




Running is a gift.
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [rrkid] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
narrow tires are usually still faster on hed's wide rims.

its just that wide tires aren't as MUCH slower.

difficult subtlety for people to grasp...oh well!


either way the bontrager R4 (which is 22 I think) might be faster than various narrower options due to its shape.



Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [styrrell] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
styrrell wrote:
..... Filling the gap with caulk or sealant is possible on any tire....
Styrrell

is that even allowed in the rules? what would you use to fill the gap?
i sense some testing coming RChung's way.....


"...I try not to ever ride as slow as 20mph. ;) ... And even more than that, I don't race with a speedometer. My computer is set up to show Power // Cadence // Time. I don't actually ever know how fast I'm going. I only know that if I'm in 53/11, and it takes more than 100rpm to hit my target watts, it's time to coast." - Jordan Rapp on '09 IMC
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [+4W/Kg] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
IIRC is there not an 'aero' tire that is near the top of the Crr list as well?
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [+4W/Kg] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote Reply
Re: Crr vs. aero gains of "aero tires" [cwg_at_opc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I use RTV sealant. Yes its always been allowed, or at least I'm not the first and I've never hear it being disallowed.

Styrrell

Styrrell
Quote Reply

Prev Next