Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [sp1ke] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sp1ke wrote:
What you don't know can't hurt you I guess...

Oh yes it can...

Train on Kickr at "Kickr reported FTP"=340W" (ie actually 310W). Ride race at FTP=340W as reported on your on-bike power meter -> blow up after 20 minutes.

Race ruined.
Last edited by: marting: Mar 17, 15 7:29
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [marting] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
marting wrote:
sp1ke wrote:
What you don't know can't hurt you I guess...

Oh yes it can...

Train on Kickr at "Kickr reported FTP"=340W" (ie actually 310W). Ride race at FTP=340W as reported on your on-bike power meter -> blow up after 20 minutes.

Race ruined.

Yup... happened to me on vacation. Riding with a friend at 225 watts... and thought " Why does this feel so hard?"

Crazy thing is... he has a KICKR too. His is accurate though.
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [marting] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Not if you don't own a power meter....


marting wrote:
sp1ke wrote:
What you don't know can't hurt you I guess...


Oh yes it can...

Train on Kickr at "Kickr reported FTP"=340W" (ie actually 310W). Ride race at FTP=340W as reported on your on-bike power meter -> blow up after 20 minutes.

Race ruined.
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [Nate Pearson] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nate Pearson wrote:
Just found out that PerfPro did it via software and is not using the Wahoo beta. We've just submitted a bug fix release to the app store. Our next iOS release (pending any critical bugs) will have this feature in it. Desktop will take a bit longer, but I think we can add it in there too.

The entire office uses Kickrs and PMs and this is a feature we've all wanted for a while. We thought we'd just wait for Wahoo to do it but it looks like doing it in software works well too.

Thanks for starting this thread and being so active guys. Talking about stuff like this really brings it to the company's attention and pushes us to be better :).


Nate - that's excellent news! I think the TrainerRoad software is a much more appropriate place for the fix - especially as it can then be applied to all smart trainers, not just the Kickr. It's unfortunate for the users who don't own power meters, however it's a brilliant fix for those of us who do as it solves all sorts of other issues as well - tires needing to warm up on Computrainer / Power beam, temperature drift with Kickr, etc. I'll be looking forward to the update in the desktop software. I would rather Wahoo spend their time figuring out the core issues to improve the experience for all their users rather than coming up with a patch for a small population of us number geeks anyway.
Last edited by: cmeeks: Mar 17, 15 10:51
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [marting] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
marting wrote:
On a slightly different topic, having tried with both TR (normal use) and PerfPro (experiments), I'm also considering a switch to PerfPro, even though I **HATE*** the PerfPro user interface. The simple reason is that PerfPro's workout creator is so much better, faster and less hassle. Right now, I'm creating TR workouts in Excel, manually pasting snippets into a text file which I then import into TR. Ugly. I'd love to see a PerfPro-style workout creator for TR.
Ok, you confused me here. Did you mix up your products. When I've created workouts in PerfPro it is essentially creating it in a glorified excel sheet where the TR Workout Creator program is more drag and drop. I only ask because I have the exact opposite viewpoint that you have. I don't know why someone woudl use excel to create TR workout with TR's Workout Creator.
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [agreif] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
agreif wrote:
marting wrote:
On a slightly different topic, having tried with both TR (normal use) and PerfPro (experiments), I'm also considering a switch to PerfPro, even though I **HATE*** the PerfPro user interface. The simple reason is that PerfPro's workout creator is so much better, faster and less hassle. Right now, I'm creating TR workouts in Excel, manually pasting snippets into a text file which I then import into TR. Ugly. I'd love to see a PerfPro-style workout creator for TR.

Ok, you confused me here. Did you mix up your products. When I've created workouts in PerfPro it is essentially creating it in a glorified excel sheet where the TR Workout Creator program is more drag and drop. I only ask because I have the exact opposite viewpoint that you have. I don't know why someone woudl use excel to create TR workout with TR's Workout Creator.


I kind of agree... TR workout creator is not that bad.

I downloaded PP trial... and will play with the workout creator today.

Overall... TR is much more intuitive to use right off the bat for sure. Easy interface to use. PP is packed with stuff though... but not easy to master without taking some time.
Last edited by: Donzo98: Mar 17, 15 15:52
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [cmeeks] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nate Pearson wrote:
Our next iOS release (pending any critical bugs) will have this feature in it.

When do you anticipate this being available? I am just about done with my kickr and this may well save it from the return.

Thanks

On the internet, you can be anything you want. It is a pity so many people choose to be stupid.
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [chrisbint] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
chrisbint wrote:
Nate Pearson wrote:
Our next iOS release (pending any critical bugs) will have this feature in it.


When do you anticipate this being available? I am just about done with my kickr and this may well save it from the return.

Thanks

Don't give up... once you get it dialed in it is awesome.

Only took me 1.5 years :)
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [chrisbint] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I think I'll try perfpro while I wait
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [astig] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
astig wrote:
I think I'll try perfpro while I wait

Well, at the moment, I am not able to get the beta firmware to talk to the public app, but the difference is actually very small. I am thinking the change in temperature might be affecting it in a positive manner. Once the difference goes above 5% on the main intervals, I will contemplate what to do. I am hoping a solution will be out before then!

Thanks

On the internet, you can be anything you want. It is a pity so many people choose to be stupid.
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [chrisbint] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Dont give up on it. Try PP in the mean time until TR updates their firmware.

I was in your same shoes and extremely frustrated with my kickr but once i discovered that i could control the kickr with my SRM and PP the difference was night and day. It's amazing when the kickr works like it was designed to do.

I just got done doing a 2x20 on PP and again, tracked perfectly

As a side note, the PP is out of BETA and is now available to download
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [yatyas] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I tried the Wahoo beta firmware/app update today which allowed my Stages ANT+ to control my Kickr and the avg power #'s over 4x5 minute intervals were spot on in ERG. Without this update I was running my Kickr in ERG at 295 watts to avg 270 on my Stages. I did this with a i pad/i phone being Android App update is not available yet. Really good stuff!
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [ccassidy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ccassidy wrote:
Donzo - I saw the same kind of factors but mine would drift from .90 (lower than SRM) to 1.08 (higher than SRM) over the course of a workout. And those are %'s so if I was doing 275 SRM watts at the end the Kickr was like 20-25 watts higher. However now it is at .80 almost all the time (who knows whats going on)
PP has a workout importer but I have not played with it. You can load PP on two machines so maybe one your desktop to create workout files. Then save them to the cloud, or thumb drive or email them to yourself and then import them on your laptop.


Just an update... played with the PP workout creator tonight. So easy! REALLY EASY!

Created workout on my desktop computer... initially tried to Email it to myself and then import it that way... NO DICE.

I then got the workout onto a USB DRIVE... but I could only get the workout to save as the Library I created. I Called the library Donzo's Workouts... Once I did that, I imported the Library in via PP.... and it was there and ready to use on the laptop.
Last edited by: Donzo98: Mar 17, 15 20:57
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [BrianB] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have measured my kickr with the vector that is torque wrenched on the pedal on my main bike. I have another bike that is on the kickr. So to calibrate the kickr i have to substitute the bikes and try with the screw adjustment to bring both power readings in line. Then i switch bikes to have the road bike for road use and the trainer bike for training. You can feel that the belt and the tension bearing are getting hotter with more minutes of exercise. That is what i think is causing the drift. The belt gets too hot and the tension bearing does not apply the same force as when cold. This is very hard to calibrate because as soon as you stop to turn the screw your belt gets colder. So when its cold the watts are higher from the kickr. As it gets warmer the watts displayed on the kickr are about the same with vector pedals and when it get even hotter like on a harder exercise it lower than the vector's.
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [costas1] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
however some(many) units are off by a steady 25-30watts AND do drift a few watts after 45mins or so.
a few watts drift is not bad compared to a difference of a cardiovascular zone for some, lol

costas1 wrote:
I have measured my kickr with the vector that is torque wrenched on the pedal on my main bike. I have another bike that is on the kickr. So to calibrate the kickr i have to substitute the bikes and try with the screw adjustment to bring both power readings in line. Then i switch bikes to have the road bike for road use and the trainer bike for training. You can feel that the belt and the tension bearing are getting hotter with more minutes of exercise. That is what i think is causing the drift. The belt gets too hot and the tension bearing does not apply the same force as when cold. This is very hard to calibrate because as soon as you stop to turn the screw your belt gets colder. So when its cold the watts are higher from the kickr. As it gets warmer the watts displayed on the kickr are about the same with vector pedals and when it get even hotter like on a harder exercise it lower than the vector's.
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [lennyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I find the drift a lot more annoying than the unit just being off. At least if it's off, you can simply apply an offset to your FTP in TrainerRoad. Even the drift isn't a huge issue as it usually settles out by the time the warmup is done. No, the REALLY annoying issue is that the amount the unit is off changes day to day. Mine used to be really accurate (purchased it in 2013) and consistent (though it still had some minor temperature drift) until the optical sensor crapped out and they had to send me a new one. It has been problematic ever since. I won't be sending mine back - this thing is too awesome when it works well and even better as PerfPro and TrainerRoad come up with fixes to make it operate like it's supposed to.
Last edited by: cmeeks: Mar 18, 15 4:47
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [Carlton Bale] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thank you for this and for everyone chiming in...I was able to make my P2M control my Kickr and just did an hour sesh.

P2M = 162NP - Recorded on Garmin 510
Kickr controlled by P2M = 161NP (recorded on TR)

Mine take about 30 secs to sync up and it does spike up right before a segment (probably normal behavior). So far I am finally happy with the setup and will continue to test. I am also testing out PerfPro as it seems to handle it much smoother but I still have to do a full session to really see. PP Interface does take a bit of time to figure it out but i can see a ton of features and again seems to handle the "Control Kickr via External PM" much smoother and easier as compared to the Wahoo 5.5 IOS App with beta firmware.
Last edited by: SBR28: Mar 18, 15 12:58
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [lennyk] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
This really tells the story nicely...

Bottom right graph....

Look at the PINK line above the LIGHT BLUE.

PINK is what the KICKR reads... and LIGHT BLUE is the SRM (and what PP records). Nice to see how off they were. It was off anywhere from 10-15 watts during the 10 minute intervals. Not too bad actually... but that was after I did Krispy's belt retensioning.

PP recorded my 3 x10 @ 214 watts... at EXACTLY 214 for all 3. Finally have peace of mind :) I can get back to accurately suffering.



Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [cmeeks] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
cmeeks wrote:
I find the drift a lot more annoying than the unit just being off. At least if it's off, you can simply apply an offset to your FTP in TrainerRoad. Even the drift isn't a huge issue as it usually settles out by the time the warmup is done. No, the REALLY annoying issue is that the amount the unit is off changes day to day. Mine used to be really accurate (purchased it in 2013) and consistent (though it still had some minor temperature drift) until the optical sensor crapped out and they had to send me a new one. It has been problematic ever since. I won't be sending mine back - this thing is too awesome when it works well and even better as PerfPro and TrainerRoad come up with fixes to make it operate like it's supposed to.
Now THIS is interesting. Wahoo keeps saying no major changes have been made but you seem to have found one that made a difference for you. Wonder if they know that.
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [agreif] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Can anyone point me to a setup guide for using PerfPro to control the trainer? I though I had it set up correctly last night, but PerfPro seemed to still be reading the Kickr's power meter rather than my Vectors. As a result, my early intervals as reported by PerfPro were reading about 9% higher than my Vectors reported to my Edge 800. I then went to the Wahoo utility app and re-enabled the Wahoo 'use external PM' feature, and everything aligned properly again.

I have checked the box in PerfPro Studio Options > ANT+ Devices > Power Meters (use the power meter menu to control the trainer) and I also have the Vector Device ID assigned to me.

I also notice that there's no option to add both trainer watts and power meter watts to the stats display. Others have shown this above, so it's clearly possible. Do certain options only appear once the Vector has woken up?

What could I be missing?
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I thought I would just wait until the TrainerRoad gang got this incorporated and not load PerfPro, but the curious part of me couldn't hold off.

I downloaded PP right at the moment of starting my training session. Having never used it before I was on edge of bailing out if I became too bogged down with a learning curve as I am usually very time crunched. It took me less than 5 minutes to download and go through the initial settings. It took about a minute to create a 2 x 20 @ 100% FTP workout because that was what I was scheduled to do last night. It took me a couple minutes how to start the workout because I had not read any directions. I was going through it quickly and found where I needed to select me as a user to get it started. The longest part of the using PP without any reading any instructions at all was getting the workout uploaded to Strava and had to send it to my RidewithGPS account and let Tapiirik send it to Strava. For some reason I could not get my Strava account linked in PP, but again I was working fast and was doing it all without instructions. It failed on sending it to my email because I did not setup that account properly. The program detected my power meter, Kickr and cadence sensor immediately and I saw the sensor ID numbers on the setup screen without having to assign them.

The PP new download works well and that was with me hastily going through the setup and workout creator to get a session started.

My N=1 experience with:
TrainerRoad controlled by the Quarq via Wahoo firmware power meter control = tracks slightly under the metrics shown on the Garmin Edge in real time. The intervals are a touch harder.
PerfPro controlled by the Quarq via the built in PP option for power meter control = tracked slightly over the metrics shown on the Garmin Edge in real time. The intervals are a touch easier.

I have a current financial commitment to TR in a paid subscription, but the PerfPro is a nice application for those who are watching this thread and may not have a training program to supplement indoor training. More than likely I will stick with TR since I have custom workouts and I am very used to a process of setup, use and uploading data post training that I like, but it is good to get a trial experience with PP. I am glad PP allows a 14 day trial run.

IMO - both options for my setup make training in the acceptable range of my assigned power levels. Within a watt or two for final workout results in AP / NP / TSS. Far better than what my Kickr was doing under its original brand new condition, which was at best 15 watts off of my assigned power levels and could be worse at times.
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [Felt_Rider] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Felt_Rider wrote:
I thought I would just wait until the TrainerRoad gang got this incorporated and not load PerfPro, but the curious part of me couldn't hold off.

I downloaded PP right at the moment of starting my training session. Having never used it before I was on edge of bailing out if I became too bogged down with a learning curve as I am usually very time crunched. It took me less than 5 minutes to download and go through the initial settings. It took about a minute to create a 2 x 20 @ 100% FTP workout because that was what I was scheduled to do last night. It took me a couple minutes how to start the workout because I had not read any directions. I was going through it quickly and found where I needed to select me as a user to get it started. The longest part of the using PP without any reading any instructions at all was getting the workout uploaded to Strava and had to send it to my RidewithGPS account and let Tapiirik send it to Strava. For some reason I could not get my Strava account linked in PP, but again I was working fast and was doing it all without instructions. It failed on sending it to my email because I did not setup that account properly. The program detected my power meter, Kickr and cadence sensor immediately and I saw the sensor ID numbers on the setup screen without having to assign them.

The PP new download works well and that was with me hastily going through the setup and workout creator to get a session started.

My N=1 experience with:
TrainerRoad controlled by the Quarq via Wahoo firmware power meter control = tracks slightly under the metrics shown on the Garmin Edge in real time. The intervals are a touch harder.
PerfPro controlled by the Quarq via the built in PP option for power meter control = tracked slightly over the metrics shown on the Garmin Edge in real time. The intervals are a touch easier.

I have a current financial commitment to TR in a paid subscription, but the PerfPro is a nice application for those who are watching this thread and may not have a training program to supplement indoor training. More than likely I will stick with TR since I have custom workouts and I am very used to a process of setup, use and uploading data post training that I like, but it is good to get a trial experience with PP. I am glad PP allows a 14 day trial run.

IMO - both options for my setup make training in the acceptable range of my assigned power levels. Within a watt or two for final workout results in AP / NP / TSS. Far better than what my Kickr was doing under its original brand new condition, which was at best 15 watts off of my assigned power levels and could be worse at times.

Interesting take on the subject...

I cracked on Tuesday night and bought PP. I didn't want to wait until TR "fixed "things. My experience is that PP and SRM are essentially 1:1 for me. I like that you can see in real time how off the KICKR is using the stats graph and Trainer Calibration factor. Soon I won't care about that... but for now it is validation that I made the right decision.

You can also customize the display to see EXACTLY what you want to see. I like that a lot too.

I made a new workout and it was a snap to do. I need to dig in to PP Analyzer too. I am blown away by the number of features it has...

I still have TR as well ( a year subscription)... and will try it again when things are fixed. For now... knowing that a WATT really is a WATT on PP is great.
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [Donzo98] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Donzo98 wrote:
Felt_Rider wrote:
I thought I would just wait until the TrainerRoad gang got this incorporated and not load PerfPro, but the curious part of me couldn't hold off.

I downloaded PP right at the moment of starting my training session....


Interesting take on the subject...

I cracked on Tuesday night and bought PP. I didn't want to wait until TR "fixed "things.


I also just made the switch, because of the external PM support and the workout editor's ease of use - every workout my coach gives me is different, and I don't have 25 minutes each time to craft it in the TR editor, add text reminders in the right places etc, or alternatively create an ERG file and import that.

There are many things I don't like about PP. The UI is very configurable, but weird - why reinvent windows? I'll miss the UI elegance of TR and also its cloud-based workout storage. And it's also a pain having to run PP inside VirtualBox on a Mac. But it's turning out to be the fastest way of getting from training plan in TrainingPeaks to doing the workout and getting the result back into TrainingPeaks.

And once I've got it reading my Kickr and Vectors properly, I'll be able to do the "Krispy fix" gradually, hopefully develop trust in the Kickr's built in power meter, and then eventually get rid of the additional overhead of swapping my Vectors between road bike and TT bike. One day it will be as simple as get on and ride, I hope.
Last edited by: marting: Mar 19, 15 6:31
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
So is it the general consensus now that getting one of these and using an external PM to control it is the only way to go? I'm on the fence about getting one but use a powertap hub currently outdoors and on my trainer. The initial DC Rainmaker review showed that it tracked pretty accurately, but this thread has me thinking otherwise....
Quote Reply
Re: Controlling the Kickr via external power meter now possible [Clempson] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Clempson wrote:
So is it the general consensus now that getting one of these and using an external PM to control it is the only way to go? I'm on the fence about getting one but use a powertap hub currently outdoors and on my trainer. The initial DC Rainmaker review showed that it tracked pretty accurately, but this thread has me thinking otherwise....

Speculating a little, there seems to have been a good batch early on, but recent models have had offset and drift problems. Suggesting that something may have changed in the design along the way. I seem to recall the difference could be identified by the location of the power connector.

My thoughts:
If you're going to use power on the road (eg time trial, triathlete), then you need to use the same external power meter with the trainer. I'm in this bucket.
If you're bunch racing where you have much less control over power output anyway, then it's still a phenomenal training tool stand alone because you use the same (built-in) power meter both for testing and training. In this scenario absolute accuracy matters much less than repeatability.
Quote Reply

Prev Next