JackStraw13 wrote:
timr wrote:
dcpinsonn wrote:
I think they messed up with this by making the US its own country. In golf it makes sense. It triathlon, it should probably be one of the European countries and then then two international squads. Idk.
I agree. Unfortunately the US does not have enough strong athletes to make it interesting. They should've done North America and include Canada and USA as one. That would give us Lionel and Paula to make it more interesting in the points game.
Iād make it the Americas vs Europeans vs The Commonwealth countries plus the rest of the world.
This was suggested after last years event also but unfortunately they didn't adopt it. I think it's the most sensible solution to even out the teams a bit more. It obviously would not help team USA but it needs to have it's own team for many reasons, and in the strong years they are more than capable of fielding a very powerful team. I feel you have to break up Europe somehow because it currently has a sizeable advantage when it comes to athletes to choose from which makes sense given it's double the USA in terms of population, and even more so vs The Internationals since most of the athletes are from the traditional triathlon countries, i.e. Australia, NZ, SA, Canada, all of which have small populations in comparison. This year of course they also had a Brazilian (Lopes) and Duffy from Bermuda.This year's Euro team didn't have a large GB representation, but it potentially could, i.e. LCB, a healthy A. Brownlee, and hopefully soon Alex Yee, so by making a Commonwealth team it simultaneously makes the Internationals stronger while (potentially) making Europe less strong, although Stadler says they could field 2 teams that could win š