BPowell_CS wrote:
It is rolling friction. Sliding friction is removed and that is the novelty of using bearings. The driveshaft is not novel, this was invented in the early 1900's. The novelty of Driven is in the engaging mechanism and use of bearings.
No, sliding friction is not removed.
The cheesegrater is rotating in an arc around the rear axle.
The the bearings are rotating around a different axis.
There is absolutely no way that there is not sliding occurring at this interface.
Angling the bearings in a cone arrangement would help this (closer to an involute bevel gear arrangement) but that would only work in one gear, you would need a different angle for every gear ratio.
That still doesn't get rid of the fact that you're putting huge forces through a single tiny cartridge bearing that is externally unsupported and totally not designed for this application.
I'm curious to know how they can achieve shifting under load without hitting neutral or over-constraining it or having to use multiple sets of rollers for each gear ratio.
I like how they claim that you can change "chainring" size as a benefit, as though that isn't already a thing with chain drive and isn't massively compromised by the need to use a different length (i.e. new) shaft.
It's cute that they've tested at 100W and extrapolated to 500W.
etc.
As someone who knows bearings I'd actually be interested to hear hambini's input on this design...