gengar01 wrote:
Thanks all for the many replies. The problem with testing is that I dont have the option to try them like that since they will all come from a different store. I might even have to order from the internet, and not even be able to go to a store to try them on.
I am a 'big' guy with 80 kgs or just under on race day with 1.81m. The bike is my stronger portion, where I will finish just at or under the hour on a Olympic and an FTP from 300 to 350 depending on where I am in the season.
I plan to do 70.3 Mallorca at around 270-300 Watts and Challenge Roth at around 230? (might change this later)
So I guess I am ok for a 'fast' suit.
I hoped some of you had the change to compare any of these 3 suits and give me a THIS ONE IS BY FAR THE BEST :))
The suits using boundary layer control (Castelli PR, Huub Anemoi, ...) bring some good value if you reach the "drag crisis" speed window.
At 230w (38km/h on a flat course, assuming you are aerodynamically relatively efficient), you are probably having no gain.
At 270w (40,x km/h on a flat course), maybe you have some limited gain.
At 300w (42km/h), ok, some measurable gain.
Then, at 42km/h, each suit is probably delivering a different gain depending on your morphology and position on the bike (changing the place of the vortex generators, ...).
Then, some other parameters need to be taken into account : chamois (depending on your saddle, ...), color (mmmmhh, this one look better with my hemet and bike....), ....
So, even if someone else was lucky enough to test all 3 in wind tunnel and velodrome, his/her answer would be useless for you.
If you want to optimize your performance gain here, test all 3 on your body, your position, in wind T or serious velodrome test. Cost is high, but it is always the case with these kinds of marginal gains. You can probably make use of these tests to improve your position (don't forget bike fit). Probably these will bring higher gains than the suit.
Or....
heads or tails
or
stick with good basic suit at 150 USD