echappist wrote:
DrAlexHarrison wrote:
As far as I can tell, her social media conduct was that she has repeatedly liked Trump & Candace Owens' posts on twitter and is being lambasted for it on social media by a few other accounts who frequently tag her sponsors and cycling media. Has anyone seen anything else that she posted that was more inflammatory? Am I missing something?!
Is liking right-of-center tweets deserving of public apology?
Just a PR move by Canyon-SRAM?
In my close vicarious experience with her personally she was one of the most genuinely kind people in the peloton, towards my wife, who was her direct competitor. Markedly more kind, and more generous with support, encouragement and tactical advice than any of the other competitors, ironically. Leaving
this anecdote here because she's being touted as a hateful person by a few on social media, and my experience indicates the opposite.
Unless being nice to your wife pays Ms. Dygert's wages, it's irrelevant. This, first and foremost, is an employment issue. Also, many of the vilest people in history (and I'm not calling Ms. Dygert vile, just pointing to a generally observed phenomenon applicable to people whose actual transgressions are orders of magnitude worse than what Ms. Dygert did) are kind to people they like. Al Capone was doting on his progeny; ditto for some of the most brutal of dictators such as Mussolini, Stalin, and Mao. It's like how Jesus says in the Bible that even the tax collector (whom was viewed with much derision) has friends. That Ms. Dygert is kind to people she chooses to like does not negate the fact that she espoused views that are considered odious.
And her views are material to her employment, because cycling is a sport primarily funded via sponsorship, and you, being married to someone who participates in pro cycling, probably understand this better than most. There's very little TV right payments and almost non-existing gate receipts. Sponsorship is all about brand image and messaging; therefore, her rhetorics is very much part and parcel of her job, in a way that doesn't apply to sportspeople who mainly derive part or much of their earnings from gate receipts and TV rights.
Ms. Dygert has two options here: either rely on the likes of Candace Owen (pun intended) to sponsor her, or look to someone who both gives a rat's ass about cycling and has the pockets to write checks. Ms. Dygert may not be the brightest of bulb, but I think she's bright enough to understand that the latter is a lot more prudent. If she really is a true believer, she can even buy out her contract any time she likes, but at the end of the day, she choose pragmatism.
Also, "right of center" in the present case is not a policy wonk issue such as an exhortation for keeping the capital gains tax rate below that of earned income, or that more states should adopt "right-to-work" laws. Instead, the "right of center" posts in question are written by a firebrand whose intentions are to troll and inflame. Calling the following remarks as merely "right of center" is like calling Guernica as merely a fighting that occurred during the Spanish Civil War: both may be factually correct on the most tenuous of connections but in reality purposely miss the point.
Yes, I understand public image for brands & athletes is virtually everything in niche sports. Appreciate you granting me such an assumption.
So, if I'm not mistaken, what you're saying is, you agree with me that this is just a PR move by Canyon/SRAM and that I'm not missing anything more than those tweets she liked? If so, cool!
The purpose was of my personal anecdote was
exclusively to provide just that, a personal anecdote, against the notion that she might be hateful, for the reason (
exclusively) that that is specifically what a few accounts on twitter and social media have publicized about her. The anecdote was
not intended to provide any argument for or against her business partnerships. If desired, I can expand on why I believe she may be genuinely nice to those who she has no affinity for. But as you pointed out, it is irrelevant to the employment discussion. Suffice it to say, I suspect this is not a tax-collectors-of-the-Bible-have-friends-too situation.
Admittedly, I should have made more clear the intellectual separation between my first 3 paragraphs and the final one, in my original post. I'm sure I've blundered sufficiently with my clarity in this post as well, and may be thoroughly picked apart. Rightfully so, if I can't make my points clearly.
Most respectfully, have at it!
Dr. Alex Harrison | Founder & CEO | Sport Physiology & Performance PhD
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
📱 Check out our app →
Saturday: Pro Fuel & Hydration, a performance nutrition coach in your pocket.
Join us on YouTube →
Saturday Morning | Ride & Run Faster and our growing
Saturday User Hub