Halvard wrote:
The truth is that records and fastest times do count in endurance sports.
Not really true. They count a lot in timed sports where conditions are consistent enough to make comparison of times meaningful. Track and road running, pool swimming, track cycling, cross country skiing - records in these sports count because they can be meaningfully compared across different courses and conditions.
Road cycling? Nobody really cares at all about times or speeds, because tactics, weather and courses make them all but meaningless, with a slight exception of comparing ascent times on the same climb. Rowing? Nobody cares that much, wind and water conditions have a big impact on speeds. Horse racing? (it's an endurance sport...) I'm not even sure they bother having a clock running do they? Triathlon? Similar to road cycling and rowing, nobody cares that much, course and world records will be noted when they're broken, but their importance comes a distant second to who actually won. Off the top of my head I could list most of the Olympic, ITU, Kona and 70.3 Worlds champions over the last couple of decades. I honestly don't think I could even come close to listing who's broken the various world records in that time. Whereas in the blue riband running and swimming events I could have a pretty decent crack at both the champions and the world record holders.