Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Aspero GRX vs. Scott Addict Gravel 30
Quote | Reply
Is the Aspero worth the extra $1000?

If the purpose of the bike were both riding/racing gravel & gravel tri, but also putting in my road bike wheels (could I just put in my Roval CLX 64 disc wheels?) and using it for road group rides, which would you choose and why?

-------------
Ed O'Malley
www.VeloVetta.com
Founder of VeloVetta Cycling Shoes
Instagram • Facebook
Quote Reply
Re: Aspero GRX vs. Scott Addict Gravel 30 [RowToTri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
well with the cervelo you get the ability to adjust the front fork depending on your wheel selection (700 vs. 650) and is made for 42 mm tires. I'm not sure of the specs of the addict but an online review said a 40 mm tire left little clearance

the world's still turning? >>>>>>> the world's still turning
Quote Reply
Re: Aspero GRX vs. Scott Addict Gravel 30 [RowToTri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I vote for yes, I don't like the idea of a gravel bike that doesn't allow you to run a 650b. The Addict CX was built as a cyclocross bike, the Addict Gravel, last time I checked, was the same frame with a different spec.
Quote Reply
Re: Aspero GRX vs. Scott Addict Gravel 30 [Andres] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In what conditions will I really appreciate those 650b wheels? Both bikes come with 700c wheels. I am not eager to buy another wheelset!

-------------
Ed O'Malley
www.VeloVetta.com
Founder of VeloVetta Cycling Shoes
Instagram • Facebook
Last edited by: RowToTri: Dec 18, 19 11:13
Quote Reply
Re: Aspero GRX vs. Scott Addict Gravel 30 [RowToTri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
But with one you can when you do want to.

On my gravel bike, I appreciate the 650b wheels in 100% of the conditions. The tires is another story.
Quote Reply
Re: Aspero GRX vs. Scott Addict Gravel 30 [RowToTri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
RowToTri wrote:
In what conditions will I really appreciate those 650b wheels? Both bikes come with 700c wheels. I am not eager to buy another wheelset!

I wondered the same thing and saw that the Shimano GRX wheels are extremely reasonably priced, so I mounted up some WTB Venture 47c.
1. It's different... but the same. The rolling feels similar to a 700c wheel of the same tread, so not much difference there. However, they are noticeable smoother due to the extra casing volume. I've liked this on the chattery dirt roads and hard-packed trails we tend to have.
2. It's hard / impossible to fit a 700c wheel with this volume into most frames. Additionally, 700 x 47 (and bigger) tires tend to feel cumbersome and in my opinion handle better on flat-bar mountain bikes.
3. Leaving my fenders set to clear 700c wheels, but mounting the 650's gives additional clearance for riding in our muddy / slushy conditions that typically jam up fenders.
4.

Back in the fall when I road Fall River rd, I moved the front axle to the forward, less offset, position in preparation for the descent down trail ridge. Without question the bike rails road corners better in this position with 700c wheels. I had left it there for my general gravel riding with 700c's. When I mounted the 650's the handling didn't jive with the 650's: There just wasn't enough trail (for me). Moving the axle back made the bike handle much more calmly and really changed the character of the bike.

What I thought was a bit of a "parlor trick" feature, is actually turning out to be game-changing for the various uses bikes like this will see.

I talk a lot - Give it a listen: http://www.fasttalklabs.com/category/fast-talk
I also give Training Advice via http://www.ForeverEndurance.com

The above poster has eschewed traditional employment and is currently undertaking the ill-conceived task of launching his own hardgoods company. Statements are not made on behalf of nor reflective of anything in any manner... unless they're good, then they count.
http://www.AGNCYINNOVATION.com
Quote Reply
Re: Aspero GRX vs. Scott Addict Gravel 30 [RowToTri] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
For use case you describe, difference in bottom bracket drop would suggest the Aspero as likely the better solution. Aspero also has lower stack, longer reach and longer front-center, all things that are typically more road bike side of the spectrum than CX bike. It's a small-ish thing, but the extra tooth on the Cervelo's big ring sorta helps it as a road bike as well. If you wanted something that would be gravel/cyclocross use, I'd go the other way - as mentioned up thread, the Addict *is* their CX design re-purposed.

Gravel bikes can kinda/sorta be put in three bins right now, in terms of design basis and where their best use cases align:

Gravel/road
Gravel/CX
Gravel/Mtb

Aspero is category one, Scott is category 2. Something like the new Evil would definitively be category 3. Sounds like you want category 1. Pretty clear cut decision between these two, and if that's what you want, the money difference is what it is.

Tech writer/support on this here site. FIST school instructor and certified bike fitter. Formerly at Diamondback Bikes, LeMond Fitness, FSA, TiCycles, etc.
Coaching and bike fit - http://source-e.net/ Cyclocross blog - https://crosssports.net/ BJJ instruction - https://ballardbjj.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Aspero GRX vs. Scott Addict Gravel 30 [xtrpickels] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Awesome, thanks!

-------------
Ed O'Malley
www.VeloVetta.com
Founder of VeloVetta Cycling Shoes
Instagram • Facebook
Quote Reply
Re: Aspero GRX vs. Scott Addict Gravel 30 [fredly] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Cool thanks.

-------------
Ed O'Malley
www.VeloVetta.com
Founder of VeloVetta Cycling Shoes
Instagram • Facebook
Quote Reply