Good questions! I'll answer below:
Epic-o wrote:
Hi Chris, I have some questions:
- Taking into account that you have developed the wind tunnel from scratch, why have you decided to go with rollers instead of a solution that represents better real world conditions (like a treadmill)? Some of the wind tunnels here in Europe have that type of equipment (Magny-Cours and Mercedes' one) and some manufacturers take a different approach to rear end design due to this. M.N. Godo said in one of his papers that ground modelisation was one of the limiting factors to achieve perfect WT-CFD correlation. Do you think that this can play a big role in correlation?
The beauty is we're free to put in any apparatus that best answers the question that we're trying to ask. For bike and equipment R&D, having a robust setup allows us to have very repeatable measurements which makes it easier to determine how/what we've changed. I've looked a bit at ground effect and for the vast majority of the bike/rider system (e.g. everything but the wheels), it's essentially a negligible impact. I believe the Godo study was on wheels. We looked at, but for now have avoided, a rolling road setup since it's just so hard to setup a test with the precision that we want...it's added complexity that does not necessarily gain us much. However, when we're talking about riders, we are very much interested in how to make the tunnel experience more representative of the real world riding. The trick is balancing that with high enough precision to still be useful. We have some ideas there...
Epic-o wrote:
- Are you able to measure torque to spin (rotational drag)?
Yup, we are getting setup to do so. The thing to remember though is any measurement of rotational drag in the tunnel will include rolling resistance (the so-called power-to-spin measurement will include rolling resistance and aerodynamic drag from rotation). So to tease out the aerodynamic drag component, we can measure the Crr in our test lab - or we can use the same tire and mounting load (normal force) for comparative studies.
Epic-o wrote:
- Can you explain us your approach to WT pedalling tests? I know that M. Cote did some testing to know which static position of the legs gives the same average drag but this was limited to 0º yaw and a bike model. Do you extrapolate those results for other yaws/bikes like Cervélo does or do you have a pedalling mannequin like Trek and Speedplay?
Yea, Mark's study was enlightening, and we will continue to look at that at yaw. For R&D stuff, I still think that we need a setup that's as robust as possible so we can get the best possible precision. There's nothing worse than not knowing for sure whether you have something that's better or not just because the variability in the measurement is so high. If and when we find that we absolutely need a pedaling mannequin, that will happen. And cool side note: since it's our test section we can do stuff like: have a mannequin on a stinger separate from the balance - so we can swap out bikes and not worry about putting the mannequin back in exactly the same spot.
Epic-o wrote:
Thanks for your answers
No prob, anytime!
Chris Yu
Applied Technology
Specialized Bicycle Components
@chrisyuinc