Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Any thoughts on these pedaling dynamics? (Levers vs. Round Chainring)
Quote | Reply
I came across this "Nubike" video today and thought it was kind of interesting. Currently limited on gearing, but that could change with more advancements.

https://www.cnet.com/...ed-a-bike-like-this/

If anything, could change bike design somewhat to make it a bit more aero. Maybe. Anyway, any thoughts on round vs. up and down pedaling efficiency?
Last edited by: ZenTriBrett: Mar 25, 19 7:52
Quote Reply
Re: Any thoughts on these pedaling dynamics? (Levers vs. Round Chainring) [ZenTriBrett] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Treadle bikes are nothing new and even predate the linked chain's adoption in cycling. They are neat, though.


Quote Reply
Re: Any thoughts on these pedaling dynamics? (Levers vs. Round Chainring) [ZenTriBrett] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That's known as a "treadle drive". Go back and look at all of the versions of that tried in the 1800s during the initial "bike boom".

Here's the thing...a crankset is doing basically the same thing (i.e. converting the largely linear extension of the legs into rotary motion), but doing so in a much more efficient manner, and in a way that more closely mimics a runners gait than a treadle. Additionally, treadles have the "deadspot" issue for starting up.

Anyway, nothing new under the sun...and didn't Obree use something similar in his land speed record attempt vehicle?

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Any thoughts on these pedaling dynamics? (Levers vs. Round Chainring) [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Oh yeah, derp. I knew that looked very familiar. I agree; anything that mimics running *should* be more efficient. Although at higher speeds, better aerodynamics might come into play.
Quote Reply