Today I registered at the 'Bicycle Sports Question Forum ' and posted some post and question from this thread. Here is the answer from John Cobb:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Aero Seat Post Bennys (John Cobb statements)
Posted: 03-14-2003 07:20 AM
Back when I wrote my first article about aero seat post I mentioned that it would stir up some stuff and it certainly has managed to continue to do that. I was doing some frame developement for a bike company and the aero post thing was supposed to be included in the bike. I had not ever done any studies about seat post shapes till then so since they were paying I started testing. Certainly without a rider on the bike then any aeroseat post will work better than round. When you put a rider on the bike then sometimes the results are different. If the rider has pretty thick upper legs, the the aeropost don't seem to help. If the rider has pretty thin upper legs the the aeropost seem to help a little. The point in my article that might have been edited out or overlooked was that for the cost of some of the aero post I don't think they offer much performance gain and it is very related to the particular rider as to the actual gain or loss. At my last Wind tunnel camp the writer for Triathlete was there and we were talking about the seat post question. He had just purchased a shiny new USE aeropost and wanted to see the results. We ran his bike, I don't remember what it was, I think it was a std. Merlin with aerobars. We ran it with his aeropost and with a Thompson round post and in his case [fairly thin upperlegs] the aeropost was better. I think it was about 7-9 sec. over a 40k. I don't think any seat post shape would make a 40+sec. difference over a 40k but sometimes in articles numbers get turned around. I'm sure the seat post question needs lot's more studies and I am still looking at it whenever I have the chance. The results of something like a seat post is really tied to several other things relating to the riders shape, when your in a very controlled test like in a windtunnel these things show up, out on the road it would be impossible to measure these small differences.
I agree that it's unfortunate that more people don't do more windtunnel testing about products but it is very expensive and time consuming. I go do testing to try and steer my customers in the right direction, period. I don't like to spend all that time and money but it's the only way I've been able to find, that let's me answer a question from a customer and feel pretty sure I'm giving the right answer. You can never believe anything written by a marketing person from some bike company because you don't ever get all the facts. I'll keep testing and publishing, I'm always glad to admit that I wrong if further testing proves something else. The more I learn about the effects that back shapes, shoulder shapes, hip shapes, leg sizes etc. have on the overall choice of equipment then the more I know I will need to spend more time testing in wind tunnels.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope the helps to clarify some question and statements from earlier posts.
Felix
http://www.weilenmann.ch.vu