therooster wrote:
Focus on "They don’t say.". From a scientist's point of view, this is very odd because of the ethical practice of science.
Corporate views are different with different motivations because of competitive forces and other marketing considerations.
When a competitive product is successful , corporations will tend to stick to the bare minimum when it comes to disclosing competitive info in marketing materials and labeling.
The less that is said , the better. There's a bottom line here too. Keep your advantages silent as best you can . Sell the sizzle, not the steak.
Did you know that before the decision was made to bring the product to market that an offer was made for the product from a large pharma company ... to the tune of 8 figures ?
When it was discovered that part of that agreement was that the existing owners of the product had to "back out", they surmised that the product would only be shelved and thus the offer went nowhere from there.
They wanted to ensure that the product made it to consumers. There's been enough hording of good ideas in this world, especially when it comes to things that revolve around health, wealth and energy.
We've been supply driven since "the apple was shoved in our faces". Time for a change where demand can exert a little more power. That comes down to more free choices.
Two questions...
Does it come in carbon fiber?
Does Kevin Moats endorse it?
If the answer is yes to either one of those questions, then where do I sign up?
"Good genes are not a requirement, just the obsession to beat ones brains out daily"...the Griz