I've 'argued' or posted that ITU has a more equitable and professional prize purse. WTC, however, may put up more total money as well as providing prize money at more total events.
You linked the WTS events, there are 8 plus a championship and a total purse of $2.2MM according to the ITU website. The listing that you showed does not include the World Cup races (10 of them), the Continental Cups (50+ of those), the Continental Champs (21 including some non-Oly distance ones). Globally there are 70+ ITU events that pay prize money at the olympic distance. And, you can race an olympic distance event almost every weekend.
If you really want to make a comparison, add up all of that money to see how it all compares. I have not done that. WTC is likely overall still more globally which is a good thing. Also, consider that 25 athletes get paid in Edmonton, which the the Grand Finale. There is also a pool of 35 athletes who get paid via the WTS (highest level of events) bonus pool. For comparison, 5 or 6 athletes get paid at WTC lower level ($$) events, 6 or 8 get paid at mid/higher level events (including conti-champs), and 10 get paid at 70.3/IM World Championships. There is no bonus pool. Simple facts.
WTC's $4MM investment is a big one in prize money. But, a high profile pro just tweeted that he feels IM events should have less top-heavy, deeper, and more equitable prize purses. There have been several pros who have, in the only avenue available now, talked about and provided thoughts about prize purses, etc. There will be changes in 2015 I am sure. Melbourne and St. George were great pro events. 140.6 mile events with 4 women and 7 men on the start list don't make great events to watch or cover. What the changes will look like, we can only guess.
Brandon Marsh - Website | @BrandonMarshTX | RokaSports | 1stEndurance | ATC Bikeshop |