In Reply To:
This came directly from American Bicycle Group. The mast as they refer to it is basically the down tube. I spoke with a lightspeed tech to ensure I did not just get the QR reps spin. Both agreed that the Lightspeed is a bit beefier and is definately heavier. The pictures are decieving as it looks much sleeker then the Tiphoon. They even indicated that the top tube while tapered is no more thiner at the seat tube then the QR. That being said, I still think the 2003/2004 Tiphoon is a better bike. I think that if you are 5'9" or taller and weigh over 165 you will probable be fine on the Blade (this is in not my opinion of a "big man") but IMHO if you are over 190 then you should definately go with the Blade. As far as refined...both bikes are made by the same guys down in Tenn. and the only difference is that the Lightspeed logo may carry more name recognition and prestige which I do not care about. I also have to jump in on the internal cable routing post that the new Tiphoon
does not have internally routed cables and most people will tell you that the Blade's internal routing is not the best. The main point is that the folks down in Tenn are real easy to talk to and you should give them a holler or e-mail them with your specs and they will steer you straight.
Francois and yourself must be smoking crack or something or I must have purchased an imposter QR Tiphoon. I have a new 2004 Tiphoon, 55cm w/700c wheelset with internal cable routing. I can send you guys a digital picture of my bike if you doubt me. Bottom line is, one of us got a raw deal or you guys have leftover Tiphoons.
Cock-A-Doodle-Doo!
Team Endurance Nation