slowguy wrote:
Looks to me like someone who just likes firearms and has a collection. Lots of different weapons, mostly all different in some way. The .50cal isn't useful for anything really for a civilian unless you have a pretty long distance shooting range or private land available to you.
The suppressor for the shotgun seems unnecessary to me, and likely to be ineffective, but multiple companies make and sell them, so they must do something. The article doesn't really say if there were other issues with this guy, or if he's just an avid hunter and gun collector who didn't comply with the law.
I think a suppressor on a pistol-grip shotgun might have some utility for a home-defense weapon. You don't really want to fire an unsuppressed short-barrel 12-gauge indoors w/o ear protection. The suppressor could allow you to quickly deploy and fire it if needed w/o causing permanent hearing damage.
"100% of the people who confuse correlation and causation end up dying."