velocomp wrote:
Moonrocket wrote:
chaparral wrote:
Moonrocket wrote:
Or carry a baby to term because you have no parents??? https://www.yahoo.com/...n-not-183703176.html
Totally logical that she is not mature enough to have an abortion, but mature enough to carry a child to term and become a mother.
Call me crazy, but I don’t think judges should make rulings while they have serious head trauma.
Or force kids who already have a huge trauma load into more for political gains.
Messed up situation. But I have to ask... I read the article. It said that her guardian supports the abortion. And then it says that either a parent or guardian must sign off. So what is the problem?
I do think she should be able to get an abortion (even though I'm pro life). But I do believe that someone under 18 should be required to have a parent or guardian sign off.
The common conflict of interest brought up on NPR was cases of abuse within the family or family's circle (friends/connections) for which the family is guilty and forcing the kid and not signing/consenting. Not necessarily just the stereotypical horny pregnant teenager in high school.