Do you know what his max HR is??? If we assume 200, then that puts his bike effort at 82.5% max and run at 84.5%.

---

"Anyone can be who they want to be IF they have the HUNGER and the DRIVE."

Do you have gain elevation from his bike course. I thought the the run was more like 1500 ft (meaning around 450m), but your data says 330m.

Love the max speed.

Dev

It's on his Strava account. It says 1092m.

Sam Long had 1086m, Kristian had 1137m, and then a couple other athletes I follow had 1110m, 1037m, and 1034m. So seems to be somewhere around 1050m-1150m.

Thanks. I wanted to see how different elevation was compared to Muskoka 70.3 where we had 1064m on bike and 338m on run. St. George seems to have a lot for grinding uphill and steep descents on the run. Bike profile is totally different.

I assume that St. George is an easier bike course than Vegas world's given how much faster many were vs Sebi's winning time and reported elevation on Vegas

This guy is a beast. I am not super familiar with this year’s course but the topography of StG is never easy and to go sub-2 hours?? That run is tough too, anytime they get up onto Red Hills Pkwy it’s brutal.

Can confirm Gustav Iden still knows what Gustav Iden needs to do.

Iden is the man.

---

https://www.strava.com/...tes/zachary_mckinney

How are the descents on both? I’ve been in some races where the descents have a huge impact; fast and flat out vs horrendously right, twisting and bad road conditions. Found this makes a massive difference to times overall. One of the races I do in the UK has descents where you are on the brakes the entire time dodging cars, sheep, potholes, gravel and hairpin bends. Soul destroying when you’ve just climbed up a 25-30% incline and expect some payback.

Muskoka is a drag strip. You would probably only need your brakes at the Dorset turnaround and rolling back into transition.

---

***

In Muskoka you get most of the ttime back due to straight and short downhills. Also don't have many super high speed downhills that are over 70kph that you tuck on....lots of 50-60kph that you are pedaling. St. George looks like 80-100kph which means that the guys lose more of the climbing potential energy in high speed aero drag. But the gross climbing is similar, you get more back in speed coming down.

but back to the thread, 300W for 46 kph for a 66 kilo guy, meaning 4.54W per kilo. Can anyone post pics of his position and equipment set up?

Haha!! Good one!!!