writersblock12 wrote:
dunno wrote:
writersblock12 wrote:
B_Doughtie wrote:
I thought his video was excellent (and I don’t give 2 shits for TT). It makes you kinda realize what the priority is for IM but also how important keeping IM around is for the sport.I’m not sure I follow how keeping IM around is good for the sport. Businesses fail and others take their place. IM has acted as an ambassador for the global promotion of triathlon but at what expense? How much of our perception of IM is truth and what is the wool being pulled over our eyes ?
If you’re trying to sell shoes or bikes then maybe your fate in the short term is tied to whether IM survives the next 8-10 months. In that respect, maybe IM is important and could domino a few other solid brands into a financial tailspin.
What’s never been good for our sport is IM’s commoditization of the human potential.
What wool is being pulled over what eyes? They hold races, you chose to enter or not. I can't see the big conspiracy?
No conspiracy at all but many seem to pay the entry fee without questioning the value of the product and now call IM corrupt for not returning their money.
They’ve been carrying this debt for years but have done such a masterful job puffing up athlete’s egos.
Now everyone seems to have woken up to the fact that IM is broke and their entry fee return policy reflects that fact.
If people didn't see value in the product then they wouldn't buy it....
So you are saying IM is bad because they aren't doing great financially?