Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: Who Still Makes a Track Bike? [Morelock] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Morelock wrote:
Mitch@Trek wrote:
Technically, we still make a track bike.

The Speed Concept can be retrofitted with our UCI-legal components that are used by our Trek-Segafredo athletes for track racing. You'd just have to make the components fit your needs but you can order it as a frame-only with all the UCI-legal components through Project One.

Are the new sc rear facing drops? It would be a real pain for someone if they are still bottom facing.

I considered cutting out the drops in my 1st gen and putting in real track drops, but decided it wasn't worth the effort as the spacing would still be an issue to work around

They are bottom facing, but a chain tensioner could be added vs cutting your frame (which sounds like a bad idea).

Mitchell Mathews | Community Manager | Trek Bikes | @mitchmathewz
Quote Reply
Re: Who Still Makes a Track Bike? [DrAlexHarrison] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The Koga bikes are sexy!

Agree with the Velo Flyer recommendation. Lots of my track friends ride them. http://veloflyerbicycles.com/
I rode a Felt but donated it to the Hellyer women's program in the summer.

clm
Nashville, TN
https://twitter.com/ironclm | http://ironclm.typepad.com
Quote Reply
Re: Who Still Makes a Track Bike? [Mitch@Trek] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Mitch@Trek wrote:
Morelock wrote:
Mitch@Trek wrote:
Technically, we still make a track bike.

The Speed Concept can be retrofitted with our UCI-legal components that are used by our Trek-Segafredo athletes for track racing. You'd just have to make the components fit your needs but you can order it as a frame-only with all the UCI-legal components through Project One.

Are the new sc rear facing drops? It would be a real pain for someone if they are still bottom facing.

I considered cutting out the drops in my 1st gen and putting in real track drops, but decided it wasn't worth the effort as the spacing would still be an issue to work around


They are bottom facing, but a chain tensioner could be added vs cutting your frame (which sounds like a bad idea).

You'd be better off going with an eccentric bottom bracket vs. tensioners... if you can find one for whatever bb system is current.

Or, realistically, if you were going to try to repurpose a bike not designed for it... just having a team mechanic to handle things like gear changes between events :)

I wouldn't suggest cutting up a bike for most folks either... but it's certainly been done, and ridden to an hour record on a speed concept even :D

My Blog - http://leegoocrap.blogspot.com
Quote Reply
Re: Who Still Makes a Track Bike? [Slowerthanyou] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Aquila
Quote Reply
Re: Who Still Makes a Track Bike? [insulinpowered] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That looks interesting, thanks.

Have you ridden one? That's very non-traditional geometry.
Quote Reply
Re: Who Still Makes a Track Bike? [Morelock] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Morelock wrote:

Are the new sc rear facing drops? It would be a real pain for someone if they are still bottom facing.


Even rear dropouts without track-style length are a real hassle. Have to keep different chains on hand for different gearing. Also they typically aren't the durable steel style that you can torque really high over and over again (I've yet to pull a wheel in track, and I don't plan to ever experience that)
Last edited by: trail: Jan 20, 21 15:30
Quote Reply
Re: Who Still Makes a Track Bike? [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Indeed, I started on a p3sl and it really only worked with one gear, and all it really did was make me realize I needed a real track bike if I was going to continue.

Yes... You can ride a converted road/tt bike with enough sacrifices / bodges... But outside of something like an hour attempt or some other specific event, it's going to be a headache bare minimum.

My Blog - http://leegoocrap.blogspot.com
Quote Reply

Prev Next