Ever since I did my first triathlon and then "biathlon" in 1983, I've always thought the R-B-R format was a triathlon "substitute" knock off, trying to cash in on the triathlon craze... and now 38 years later, I still believe that, and think it doomed the sport from the beginning. Now called a duathlon, it's two sports not three. I would like the sport to separate itself from trying to be a 3 event triathlon wannabe. It's a du, so have two events. Run, and then Bike to the finish. Why complicate it with another transition? And I've always thought it would be great to bust out the bike to the finish. I'd go with what seems to be today's most popular distances, of half marathon/100K as the main event. Throw all the shorter stuff in there to entice newbs. Our local tri crowd is very small, and local events are lucky to draw 100 people. Our local running crowd is huge, and following strava, a very large percentage cross train on bike. Our local bike crowd is also huge, and our most popular events are 100K "metric centuries", and having participated in them, they are full of running crowd people. I think combining both, in a very SIMPLE, basic, non threatening event, would go over well, and I'm betting would draw more folks than our local triathlons. Also think about the fitness boom that is very possible, post covid. Nobody is swimming with closed pools, but folks are out cycling and running like crazy. Done right and properly marketed, duathlon, or RunBike, or some other catchy name, the sport might be facing a second chance to get it right, in the next year, and going forward.
Athlinks / Strava