pk wrote:
Evgen wrote:
I was very interested in this topic. Did my own test at the local lab.
I ran at three different speeds: 2h49m marathon, 3:10 marathon and 3:30 marathon time. next% was significantly faster in my case. Look at the attached picsOn my feel I likes next% most of all.
the protocol:
The subject performed three series of running on a treadmill at a speed of 12, 13.5 and 15 km * h. Each series consisted of 4 runs of 5 minutes in different sneakers,
complete rest intervals between 2 min. Rest pauses were used to changing shoes. The first segment was not taken into account in further analysis;
as a warm-up. Averaged data of the last 3.5 minutes were selected for analysis. each segment to exclude the activation period. Before each episode
the subject's body temperature, temperature and humidity were recorded ambient air, the degree of saturation of hemoglobin with oxygen, the amplitude of the tooth
R in standard leads. Segmental analysis of body weight was performed before the first series of running sections. Rest time between episodes was not regulated,
but, it was not less than 5 minutes and not more than 10 minutes. Model used as a control- Nike zoom fly 3 sneakers
Research methods:
Bioimpedance method was used for segmental analysis of body weight. For determination of VO2, VCO2, VE, BF, VT, CHO, FAT, gas analysis and ergospirometry. An ergometer was used for dosing the load - running track.
