The continual use of the terms cheater and mechanical doping are getting super old. The shoes ARE legal. So use what's legal. Using those terms in relation to other forms of doping isn't allowed - I don't think posters here should be able to throw those terms around for the shoes either. It's simply and blatantly NOT that. And stop with the going back and restricting everything nonsense. Why don't we do that with bikes? Why don't we regulate wetsuits even better to make them more even? I mean...life isn't fair.
Some here say they want to go all the way back and it's silly. I was like...13, maybe 14, when I got my Scott DH bars in 1988 or 89. What a fun, fantastic game changer. Why not make the races slower? And most of the studies coming out are not that the carbon plated shoes are springy mechanisms, I believe, but it's the interface between substantially better foams and the carbon plate that is increasing the economical benefit of the shoes. And, weren't they originally designed also to decrease injury for Kipchoge et al to be able to train more? That's the biggest takeaway I have from triathlete's reviews of the shoe - they feel less beat up after an IM run. That benefits the sport I think. Ben Hoffman is running in them, but ran 2:38 in IMSA in the Peg Turbo (zoom x foam) v 2:43 Kona and 2:36 IMFL. Not 90-120 seconds per 10k type differences.
Anyway - at your level and mine, we should be concentrating on being the best we can be. I don't worry about how many P5Discs finish ahead of my P2 with mechanical, I give my all and see what happens. The carbon (or lack of) in my shoe does nothing to distract from that.
Out of interest - how are you going to get the shoes from before you were injured in order to compare?
DFRU - Detta Family Racing Unit...the kids like it and we all get out and after it...gotta keep the fam involved!
Some here say they want to go all the way back and it's silly. I was like...13, maybe 14, when I got my Scott DH bars in 1988 or 89. What a fun, fantastic game changer. Why not make the races slower? And most of the studies coming out are not that the carbon plated shoes are springy mechanisms, I believe, but it's the interface between substantially better foams and the carbon plate that is increasing the economical benefit of the shoes. And, weren't they originally designed also to decrease injury for Kipchoge et al to be able to train more? That's the biggest takeaway I have from triathlete's reviews of the shoe - they feel less beat up after an IM run. That benefits the sport I think. Ben Hoffman is running in them, but ran 2:38 in IMSA in the Peg Turbo (zoom x foam) v 2:43 Kona and 2:36 IMFL. Not 90-120 seconds per 10k type differences.
Anyway - at your level and mine, we should be concentrating on being the best we can be. I don't worry about how many P5Discs finish ahead of my P2 with mechanical, I give my all and see what happens. The carbon (or lack of) in my shoe does nothing to distract from that.
Out of interest - how are you going to get the shoes from before you were injured in order to compare?
DFRU - Detta Family Racing Unit...the kids like it and we all get out and after it...gotta keep the fam involved!