japarker24 wrote:
TheStroBro wrote:
Got links for statements made from her likely personal page on this public social media platform?
There's a difference between perhaps say her gut feeling, versus her putting leverage on the various jurisdictions that have permitted this race. That would be something called corruption. But if ti's just her gut feeling then it's her gut feeling.
Dude, relax on the conspiracy theories...........she has been "on record" saying the race won't happen. We are in the middle of a worldwide pandemic. If she were strong arming people to cancel the race, no way is that "corruption".
Well she does not work for Ironman. The event is still being planned, but of course there are currently limitations on crowd sizes in Arizona, large events etc. And the event itself travels through a few cities plus and indian reservation, so there may be different rules. So those restrictions will have to relax in time first, among other things. As with anything this year, "no one knows what will happen" as they say. A lot can change--for better or worse--in four months during this pandemic.
The run course goes through the location where the bridge collapsed, twice, but that's easy enough to change I'd imagine. All of the chemicals that leaked (est 500 gallons) went into a storm drain, which dumps into a dry riverbed on the west side of the dam for the lake. There was a bunch of debris from the bridge floating in the water, but no contamination from what I understand. And of course, that can be fixed anyways.