zedzded wrote:
windywave wrote:
Someone brought up Australia As an example of people ājust having disagreementsā, so I literally found an article within seconds of two women who ended up in the hospital after their disagreement.
Tensions are running very hot right now, and its reasonable to suspect heightened actions from people who are upset. She tried to get away multiple times, she kept her cool. This womans hand was forced a bit, and Im thankful she showed some restraint. We may disagree on that.
We were in a bar in Chicago watching the McGregor fight and some guy wanted to start a fight with me because I took his barstool. He had been gone 15 min on a standing room only night. I calmly explained he had left and even after we agreed he could have it (bc it wasn't worth it) he was following us, wanting to fight me, called me a faggot and a pussy, etc etc. Only thing I could do was walk away but thankfully there was a fight to watch and he got out of my face. But these are the people out there. One punch from him and Id be on the floor, concussion, worse? Who knows. And that was with me walking away putting myself between think you and I just have to agree to disagree on this point. The him and my wife. One sucker punch and its over. There is no manual for this, and no warnings as to which idiot will make it violent and which ones are all bark and no bite.
There have been a few people killed in Australia in bar fights (from punches) so I was being a bit flippant when I said the worst case scenario was a broken nose. But it's much harder to kill someone with a punch than a gun. Anyone can kill someone with a gun. We also now have changed the laws so a "one punch kill" can end up with a 10 year sentence.
re your situation in a Chicago bar, it could have ended up with either of you in hospital or worse from a sucker punch, but can you see how if guns get pulled by guys that are highly adrenalised as well as having had a few beer that the situation could be much, much worse. That incident in the New York bar highlights that. A few minor disagreements over a female touching other females butts, 20mins later two people shot, one dead and 3 arrested and charged with murder. 5 people's lives changed irrevocably.
I understand. The problem is, a 10 year sentence doesnt help the person who's dead.
The people whose lives get changed are definitively the ones who caused the issue and the victims. If the aggressors want to cause an issue, peoples lives will still be changed, whether a gun is involved or not. The aggressors deserve to have their lives changed, theyāre making a choice and taking the risk, however big or small. The victims deserve a chance to prevent their lives from being changed.
The alternative is that we leave innocent people to be at risk without any chance to defend themself. That is a big issue for a lot of people. The basic right to defend yourself in a situation that you did not put yourself in.
In the NYC example, the gun was illegal, the shooting was pre-meditated, and the victims were trying to protect themselves. They still got shot. They were physically groped, and shot as they were leaving because they dared to stand up for themselves and tried to leave.
Loose cannons or people void of morals will still do evil things. The question we have to figure out a reasonable answer to is how do we allow people to defend themselves against evil people.