Fleck wrote:
3 of the top 4 guys in this race put out efforts that put them at or above Egan Bernal on a w/kg FTP level. I doubt there's anything fishy going on, lots of guys are very new to zwift and probably don't have the best setups. But it's clear that they have inaccurate power measurement. Agreed - more work needs to be done here. More standardization. The more the better.
My wife races, for a semi-pro team on Zwift and is in real life and on the real roads, one of the top Master's Women's Road cyclists in Canada. She's raced on Zwift with three different trainers and each one was a bit different with the power profiles, and how they were expressed.
This is all REALLY new, and is kind of a work in progress for all concerned. I think we just need a bit of patience to work some of the bugs out.
Unless you standardize everything it’ll be tough. I have a tacx Neo 2, stages left side, and Assioma. They all read differently and everything that needs calibrated is. My stages reads highest and my Assioma next and Tacx lowest.
I use my Tacx because it works better for workouts as there is no lag for shifts in power during erg mode but if I switch to either power meter, I’m all of a sudden a far better cyclist.
From a lifestyle perspective it just means I need to do a couple ramp tests on my Tacx and Assioma so I don’t have pacing issues during racing season.
In Lionels video he has a very refreshing perspective on this but I’ll let the video Talbot posted speak for itself.
Dan Mayberry
Amateur a lot of things, professional a few things.