windywave wrote:
CaptainCanada wrote:
windywave wrote:
CaptainCanada wrote:
windywave wrote:
CaptainCanada wrote:
LCtriguy1 wrote:
slink wrote:
windywave wrote:
Andrewmc wrote:
Now they'll be able to retire on any judgements for invasion of privacy by the press :) I've massive sympathy for them, why suck up all the BS when you're not in the running in any meaningful way for the CEO role
Things like security now become interesting
They're still public figures and their entire plan to make money is to whore themselves out to brands.
I don’t understand how this new charitable foundation will work. How are they going to fund it? If they aren’t members of the Royal Family anymore, what is the appeal? What exactly have they accomplished that will make people pay to see them?
Seriously?
Ever heard of Paris Hilton? Kim Kardashian?
Being a known name/face IS the accomplishment. The work is already done.
Windywave has a giant stick up his butt about this. Not sure why.
They're not my royal family they're yours.
And this explains the stick how?
There is none, but since you and your co-subjects are unaware of the shambolic idiocy of your royal family consider it a PSA
Thanks. I will listen to your opinion when your country stops treating your leader like a king.
He's gone in four or eight years. Your Queen has been around for 60
How many times in those 60 years has 'our' queen interjected herself in to our politics?
How many times in the last 3.5 years has your leader acted like he was your actual monarch, and you guys have been perfectly happy to just let him?
Long Chile was a silly place.