Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Hoka equivalent to brooks glycerin
Quote | Reply
After looking at Hokas website and some googling, the Hoka equivalent to a brooks glycerin is not clear to me.

For some background, I’ve been happily in the glycerins for about 7 years. Since starting tris from running (about one year), I’ve been fighting some peroneal tendinitis whenever I add any intensity. I’m thinking the hokas may be the answer (maybe not?).
Quote Reply
Re: Hoka equivalent to brooks glycerin [Tri.Tony] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I cannot give you current experience. However, I ran in Glycerins in 2013, as Brooks most cushioned shoe, and went to the Hokas later in 2013, and never looked back. I've always run in their most cushioned shoe offering, which is currently the Bondi 6, and LOVE them. I'm an older runner, and the days of tolerating racing flats and lighter, less cushioned shoes are over. I train and race in the Bondi 6's, and I do believe they have saved my running career.

Athlinks / Strava
Quote Reply
Re: Hoka equivalent to brooks glycerin [Tri.Tony] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I agree, go with the cushiest shoe to start with, the Bondi 6, or if you can get it, the retro Bondi B...
Quote Reply