Slightly different case from the thread, but along the same lines:

https://www.cnn.com/...d-circuit/index.html

Basically:

"The Committees' interests in pursuing their constitutional legislative function is a far more significant public interest than whatever public interest inheres in avoiding the risk of a Chief Executive's distraction arising from disclosure of documents reflecting his private financial transactions," the court said.

If he were audited annually we would have heard from him by now.

As for his taxes "remaining closed to the public"... I will/would never STFU, if the one who is making policy regarding my taxes will not show me their taxes.