Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

P3 vs P5X
Quote | Reply
Good morning. I'm currently riding a Cervélo P3 and am curious if it's possible to quantify gains in time and watts saved by moving to a Cervélo P5x. It would be for ironman distance races with a time of around 6:30 hours on a flat course like Ironman Woodlands. Thanks.
Quote Reply
Re: P3 vs P5X [jkjt11] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
If you're doing a 6:30 on a P3, I'd be focused on the engine...

Having a 4 cylinder engine in a Ferrari doesn't make a whole lot of sense
Quote Reply
Re: P3 vs P5X [jkjt11] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Your position on both bikes matters much more, and how you’re strapping your food/nutrition to the P3... speaking strictly from an aero perspective.

Unless you’re 80, maybe spend the money on dialing in your position and even more importantly coaching. With a 6:30 bike split I suspect there is lower hanging fruit. I’d be surprised if the frame makes more than 5 minutes assuming equivalent position.
Last edited by: wintershade: Oct 26, 19 9:16
Quote Reply
Re: P3 vs P5X [jkjt11] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You can piece it together. Here’s a review of the P5x to the old P5. Combine this with P5 to P3 reviews, and you get a rough estimate. My hunch it will save you at least 5 minutes. Maybe more at your speed.

https://www.slowtwitch.com/...rodynamics_6048.html
Quote Reply
Re: P3 vs P5X [wintershade] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Sounds good. Thanks.
Quote Reply
Re: P3 vs P5X [exxxviii] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
exxxviii wrote:
You can piece it together. Here’s a review of the P5x to the old P5. Combine this with P5 to P3 reviews, and you get a rough estimate. My hunch it will save you at least 5 minutes. Maybe more at your speed.

https://www.slowtwitch.com/...rodynamics_6048.html

Thanks.
Quote Reply