RowToTri wrote:
They have a responsibility to anticipate dangerous conditions and provide reasonable accommodations. I applaud them for doing this. This is not a softening of "Ironman". No one that gets on a cooling bus is going to be contesting for a podium and none of them are getting an advantage not enjoyed by someone else. Maybe someone won't die because they made this decision.Waaaaaay back in the day in the early 90's I was running at Ironman Canada in Penticton and it was one of those crazy 100F type days and I was going neck and neck with this guy and we were running beside Skaha lake (the old course had 10km each ways beside the lake). We were suffering and chatting at the same time and this guy said, "I am going to do what I do in 100 mile ultra runs....if there is a lake and I am overheating I am jumping in for a minute and letting my core cool and then get back on the run course and then I will be flying. I figured I'd toast him by just keeping running. Around 2 miles later, he flew by me and I kept inching my way back towards him. On the "back part" he did this again and after he re passed me, I never saw him again. Keep in mind this was a ~70F lake on a 100F day, so he had major cooling and being completely soaked after he started running also helped his cooling.
Not sure a cooling bus would have anywhere near the same effect, but I have thought about the lake option at a few races and yet to use it. When I did Ironman France in Nice on one of those crazy hot days I really though it would be a good option but was scared of stepping off the course and someone DQing me and being too hot and dizzy to argue back in French that I am re entering the run course where I left.
I think for an Ironman the time lost jumping in a lake could easily be gained back. In a half IM, probably not. Sitting in a bus, no way that provides enough cooling effect to make back ANY reasonable time.
I'd think they would put it on the run course though.