I'm thinking about a cockpit upgrade when I swap my 2018 Cervelo P2 to Ultegra Di2 this off-season and wanted to tap the collective wisdom on pros / cons of the 51 Speedshop Mono-Riser Aerobar versus the TriRig Alpha X
This is what I've got so far, but let me know if I got anything wrong, if there are considerations I missed, or overall experiences / recommendations
Would love any input on the aero impact of 3:1 versus 6:1 base bar airfoils given similar degrees of stack / reach range and tilt as I continue to refine my position. Also looks like the Alpha X allows for a narrower potential pad width?
51 Speedshop Mono-Riser:
TriRig Alpha X:
This is what I've got so far, but let me know if I got anything wrong, if there are considerations I missed, or overall experiences / recommendations
Would love any input on the aero impact of 3:1 versus 6:1 base bar airfoils given similar degrees of stack / reach range and tilt as I continue to refine my position. Also looks like the Alpha X allows for a narrower potential pad width?
51 Speedshop Mono-Riser:
- 65mm of pad stack range / 50mm of pad reach range
- 113mm of pad stance range (142mm at narrowest measured at pad centers)
- Min stack height of 82mm
- Up to 17 degree tilt (12 degrees without tilting base bar)
- No Di2 Junction Box cavity
- 3:1 airfoil
- Kamm-Tail design
- Center-pull brake cable port
- Radial-shape base bar
- Better arm cups and extensions?
TriRig Alpha X:
- 125mm of pad stack range / 52mm of pad reach range
- Pad stack range includes stem spacers, 50mm range with just pad spacers
- 93mm of pad stance width range (109mm at narrowest measured at pad centers)
- Looks like 221mm narrowest measured at pad outside edge, with cups being 112mm wide
- Min stack height of 50mm
- Up to 17.5 degree tilt (all without tilting base bar)
- Di2 Junction Box cavity
- 6:1 airfoil (is there a real aero benefit versus 3:1 bars?)
- Kamm-Tail design
- Center-pull brake cable port
- Flat base bar