I was thinking about this over the weekend as I considered which criteria we use to determine a person's worth in general. By worth I mean what kind of people we are -- good, bad, etc. After pondering that for a moment, I started thinking about how we figure out whether or not we are "good" or "bad" triathletes. (How I segued into that I don't know.) Do we use race results, the kind of bikes we ride, the kind of race kit we wear, or how we balance our triathlon habit with the rest of our lives? Do we use different criteria for pros and age groupers?
Is someone who posts fast race times necessarily a good triathlete? Are slower athletes worse than fast ones or is there more to it than that?
RP
Is someone who posts fast race times necessarily a good triathlete? Are slower athletes worse than fast ones or is there more to it than that?
RP