Hutch wrote:
The bigger question that has likely been debated to death here, is why even use rollers? Balancing on a bike isn't much of a limiting factor in triathlon performance so why work on it? You can be just as successful using a trainer (or likely more successful using a trainer) than using rollers. My opinion is that rollers are just something else you can brag to your friends about. 'I'm a real cyclist because I use rollers' 'I can ride with my eyes shut on rollers', 'I can ride no hands on rollers' 'I can spin at 110rpm on rollers'. Rollers = Ego
Just like . . ."I do triathlons blah blah blah" = Ego.
Without rehashing the debate, rollers vs. trainers are not equivalent. Sure, you can get strong and fit from trainer sessions, yet still have poor technique. You have to have a smooth pedaling technique on rollers, else you can't ride them well. If you can have both, that's a nice setup. If you have to choose one, rollers give you more. Although there is a short learning curve.