I've heard two conflicting things involving rest duration between shorter intervals. Let's say "short" is pursuit length or shorter, 4min.
I've heard both.
1. To limit rest to a ratio to maximize the time your body is deprived of the oxygen it needs. Think of sets of 30/30's or something.
2. To lengthen rest for higher intensity shorter intervals to maximize the quality of each one and how many you may be able to do.
Or, are both true and just accomplish different things?
Is #1 about "clearance" or "recovery" and #2 is about "tolerance"?
For the following, what's the calculus?
-30sec to 1min all outs
-2min to 4min
What's the difference between taking 3min rest for 3min intervals versus 4min? 5min? Is the least practical recovery RBI always the approach? Certainly not for sprint workouts.
Help me out here.
I've heard both.
1. To limit rest to a ratio to maximize the time your body is deprived of the oxygen it needs. Think of sets of 30/30's or something.
2. To lengthen rest for higher intensity shorter intervals to maximize the quality of each one and how many you may be able to do.
Or, are both true and just accomplish different things?
Is #1 about "clearance" or "recovery" and #2 is about "tolerance"?
For the following, what's the calculus?
-30sec to 1min all outs
-2min to 4min
What's the difference between taking 3min rest for 3min intervals versus 4min? 5min? Is the least practical recovery RBI always the approach? Certainly not for sprint workouts.
Help me out here.