RCCo wrote:
Yeah but my car was pretty useful today for driving my kids to school. How useful was your gun?
I don’t have a gun.
Civilize the mind, but make savage the body.
- Chinese proverb
Lavender Room
Login required to started new threads
Login required to post replies
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [RCCo]
[ In reply to ]
How useful was your gun?
I don’t have a gun.
Civilize the mind, but make savage the body.
- Chinese proverb
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [RCCo]
[ In reply to ]
RCCo wrote:
Yeah but my car was pretty useful today for driving my kids to school. How useful was your gun?
Without guns, you may not have a school to drive to, so, pretty fucking useful.
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers
Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [907Tri]
[ In reply to ]
907Tri wrote:
I don't disagree with that comment at all. But our constitution allows citizens the right to have certain guns based on qualifications through background checks.
Which guns, specifically, does your Constitution allow? And where might I find the part in the Constitution pertaining to background checks?
How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [BLeP]
[ In reply to ]
BLeP wrote:
907Tri wrote:
I don't disagree with that comment at all. But our constitution allows citizens the right to have certain guns based on qualifications through background checks.
Which guns, specifically, does you Constitution allow? And where might I find the part in the Constitution pertaining to background checks?
Pew pew guns. Bang bang guns. Pow pow guns. All kinds of guns.
The section on background checks may only be viewed by US citizens. Sorry ...
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers
Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [JSA]
[ In reply to ]
JSA wrote:
BLeP wrote:
907Tri wrote:
I don't disagree with that comment at all. But our constitution allows citizens the right to have certain guns based on qualifications through background checks.
Which guns, specifically, does you Constitution allow? And where might I find the part in the Constitution pertaining to background checks?
Pew pew guns. Bang bang guns. Pow pow guns. All kinds of guns.
The section on background checks may only be viewed by US citizens. Sorry ...
Bang bang guns are inherently more dangerous than pew pew guns. They should be banned.
How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [BLeP]
[ In reply to ]
BLeP wrote:
JSA wrote:
BLeP wrote:
907Tri wrote:
I don't disagree with that comment at all. But our constitution allows citizens the right to have certain guns based on qualifications through background checks.
Which guns, specifically, does you Constitution allow? And where might I find the part in the Constitution pertaining to background checks?
Pew pew guns. Bang bang guns. Pow pow guns. All kinds of guns.
The section on background checks may only be viewed by US citizens. Sorry ...
Bang bang guns are inherently more dangerous than pew pew guns. They should be banned.
Another commie Canadian coming after our guns!
Just remember, pew pew guns are usually black and scary ...
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers
Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [JSA]
[ In reply to ]
Can we bring Israel and short term conscription (gun training) into this?
I mean, just sayin. If you require everyone to serve even just 2 years and take firearms training in that environ, you'd save lives. Maybe not postal mental cases, but accidents possibly. Maybe make it right after HS.
Your qualification to gun ownership is your 2 years conscription before age 21.
I'm against conscription, but if it ended the mess we have now.......I'd give my 2 years and trained how to handle a weapon properly.
I mean, just sayin. If you require everyone to serve even just 2 years and take firearms training in that environ, you'd save lives. Maybe not postal mental cases, but accidents possibly. Maybe make it right after HS.
Your qualification to gun ownership is your 2 years conscription before age 21.
I'm against conscription, but if it ended the mess we have now.......I'd give my 2 years and trained how to handle a weapon properly.
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [JSA]
[ In reply to ]
JSA wrote:
Just remember, pew pew guns are usually black and scary ...
I just solved the mass shooting problem.
All guns have to be pink.
The vast majority of mass shooters are straight men. What straight man is going to be cool with pulling out a bag of pink guns and shooting people with them?
How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [BLeP]
[ In reply to ]
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [orphious]
[ In reply to ]
orphious wrote:
That's no good. Too much black.
And it has to be mandatory for all guns,
How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [BLeP]
[ In reply to ]
Better?
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [BLeP]
[ In reply to ]
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers
Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [BLeP]
[ In reply to ]
BLeP wrote:
JSA wrote:
Just remember, pew pew guns are usually black and scary ...
I just solved the mass shooting problem.
All guns have to be pink.
The vast majority of mass shooters are straight men. What straight man is going to be cool with pulling out a bag of pink guns and shooting people with them?
Straight men with mental illness!!!
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [Duffy]
[ In reply to ]
Duffy wrote:
RCCo wrote:
Yeah but my car was pretty useful today for driving my kids to school. How useful was your gun?
I don’t have a gun.
You mean that ALL of them were lost overboard, that one time ??
RayGovett
Hughson CA
Be Prepared-- Strike Swiftly -- Who Dares Wins- Without warning-"it will be hard. I can do it"
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [JSA]
[ In reply to ]
JSA wrote:
RCCo wrote:
Yeah but my car was pretty useful today for driving my kids to school. How useful was your gun?
Without guns, you may not have a school to drive to, so, pretty fucking useful.
I think he was referring to the usefulness of a gun in the US. In Afghanistan I can certainly see this gun's usefulness.
BTW, why is he walking in front of the truck? Wouldn't it be safer behind it if there is a anti personal landmine? Or maybe he is looking for IED activated by the bigger weight of a vehicle?
Re: Trying to understand the NRA more [raygovett]
[ In reply to ]
raygovett wrote:
Duffy wrote:
RCCo wrote:
Yeah but my car was pretty useful today for driving my kids to school. How useful was your gun?
I don’t have a gun.
You mean that ALL of them were lost overboard, that one time ??
Wasn’t really using them plus having thoughts of suicide prompted me to sell them.
Civilize the mind, but make savage the body.
- Chinese proverb
Pretty good reason to sell them. But what about knives? Did you sell your knives? Any bridges of cliffs nearby? Those should all be sealed off for your protection. And railroads. And highways.
Don't mean to be an ass. It is just in the spirit of LR overreaction/all or nothing BS. :-)
Don't mean to be an ass. It is just in the spirit of LR overreaction/all or nothing BS. :-)