BarryP wrote:
Quote:
I think he won because in this two-party system, the other party nominated one of the least likable candidates in recent history.
I don't disagree with this statement.
But how did he get the nomination in the first place? He ran against 19 other Republicans, and the party chose him over all of them. Look, I get it. They didn't actually vote for him because they thought he was great at business. They voted for him for the same reason why people voted for Jesse the Body Ventura. Because he's an outrageous celebrity and people are dumb.
But part of his celebrity persona is that he's an amazing businessman. They didn't vote for him because he's an amazing businessman. They voted for him because he's the guy on TV, and he's the guy on TV because he fooled people into thinking he was an amazing businessman.
He got the nomination, in part, because it was clear Hillary was going to get the other nomination and the other candidates wouldn't have attacked her the way he did. That resonated with people, especially Republicans, after years of candidates that never fought back. (Romney as an example).
And I don't understand your last point. Losses don't not mean he's not a great businessman. The guy is wealthy and has had well documented losses but he's also recovered from them to re-build wealth. Does losses in a period of your business life disqualify you from being a great businessman?