DarkSpeedWorks wrote:
As you might imagine, a double blind study on something like this would be challenging (or maybe impossible) to do. But that said, the study of caloric restriction/I.F. is a well established line of scientific inquiry, and research on this topic has been done with many species of animals including humans. As far as I'm aware, nearly all of the results across all animal species (including humans) all point in essentially the same direction: caloric restriction/I.F. seems to have considerable and quite potent health effects/benefits. If you want to see for yourself, the best thing I have seen that has summarized the current state of this research has been this short BBC doc about I.F. (link below). In the documentary, there are a number of well-respected scientists that talk about their research (and their very intriguing results). Many of their findings are, in my view, simply astounding.
But take a look and decide for yourself. It is compelling stuff.
Link to BBC doc:
https://vimeo.com/170735109
Pretty good summary right here.
I'd say much of nutrition science is junk. Lots of bad epidemiology and false conclusions.
The science of longevity however is leading to more research with regards to fasting. Who knows where it will end up. In my opinion, based off what I've read, fasting and periodic caloric restriction is a good thing.
Plus, if you don't like it, just eat something.