Thomas Gerlach wrote:
Culley22 wrote:
“Headphones, headsets which are
inserted in or covering the ears are not allowed during any portion of the event.”
Seems pretty specific to me.
ETA: why not just say “no personal music device” or something like that? But they didn’t. They went with the “dampens the outside noises” causing the inability to hear outside noises as well. The bone conducting ones don’t do this, and maybe they are loosening the rules. As ol’ Bob Babbit mentioned they used to use the bone conducting thing around their neck back in the days...maybe this is on that level.
I did a search in the official global Ironman rules doc for your quote and I can't find that quote. Where did you pull it from and are you looking at the quote I posted above which is directly from the rules doc. It is a bit different than yours.
Here are the rules fwiw.
Regardless we are getting so far in the weeds, we can find any number of loopholes/technicality in anything, Products like "aftershocks" technically cover your ears, just not in the way you are thinking, they drape around the back side of your ear but still covering. If you can't agree to that then then just run the cans offset a bit so they are not covering the ear either. Or get a set of vertical sport headphones where the buds are tiny and don't cover them at all and rest outside of the ear canal.
I have no idea why Ironman and their lawyers/rules people write things the way they do. But it is more than just music. To me it is about audible communication devices than it is music. Music is a subset, and those device can be used to play music, but you also don't know if something else is going on, say a wireline to a coach or something else.
I don't think they are loosening the rules. If the doc you are referring to is old then maybe the clarification was for exactly this reason.
Quote came directly out of the athlete’s guide for St.G that is in front of me. So not old.
I’d disagree that the aftershocks in anyway cover your ears, or are intended to (unlike other headphones). But you’re right we are in the weeds, but there is an argument there to be made if someone went with the bone conducting route.