fakename11 wrote:
Duffy wrote:
klehner wrote:
mck414 wrote:
Curious, what is he lying about? The name doesn't ring any bells.
Election fraud.
There’s no election fraud.
I heard that from someone, can’t quite recall who....
There is no significant in person voter fraud. This case in no way changes that. And requiring ID would not have prevented it.
But I'm betting you already knew that.
Who said anything about ID?
And btw, the vote shenanigans that went on here we’re done with absentee ballots. If you had to vote in person and show ID they could not have done this.
Either way, I’m not in favor of voter ID laws. But for some reason some people think that because I hold one view on one subject that is in line with certain political groups then I must hold all the other views attached to those groups.
I call those people “simpletons”.
Civilize the mind, but make savage the body.
- Chinese proverb