Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [torrey] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
torrey wrote:
BLeP wrote:
wimsey wrote:


No, you misunderstand. You get only the mosquitoes, though we will throw in the black flies gratis. If you want the Boundary Waters, that shit costs extra. A lot extra.


No, you are the one who does not understand. You will give us the Boundary Waters and you will build a wall around it on your own land outside of the Boundary Waters. You can declare a national emergency to pay for it, whatever.

I am giving you 1 Canadian dollar.

Do it.

Don't make me send in our troop.
We are not dumb enough to put the wall on the wrong side of an important source of freshwater and restrict our access to it. That is FAKE NEWS.

Chapeau.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?
Quote Reply
Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JSA wrote:
BCtriguy1 wrote:
JD21 wrote:
Buy Montana and we’ll throw in New Jersey for free.


It was looking like a sweet deal until you brought up New Jersey.

You have to take New Jersey and all of its residents.

Fine, but, we are 'gifting' Quebec to you. Enjoy.

Long Chile was a silly place.
Quote Reply
Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Montana? There's nothing wrong with Montana. Boring yes, but no real problems. Can't we sell them Alabama instead?






Take a short break from ST and read my blog:
http://tri-banter.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes







They constantly try to escape from the darkness outside and within
Dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good T.S. Eliot

Last edited by: len: Feb 16, 19 5:07
Quote Reply

Prev Next