Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Disc brakes less than 1w slower
Quote | Reply
Testing proves discs are less than 1w slower. 0.3w with a 140mm rotor. You may now tear apart their testing protocols and dispute the empirical evidence. Go...


https://www.parcours.cc/blogs/news/the-great-disc-brake-debate
Last edited by: benb: Jan 22, 19 13:06
Quote Reply
Re: Disc breaks less than 1w slower [benb] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
There's not even enough information given to tear it apart.

What frame(s)? Watts at what speed?
Last edited by: trail: Jan 22, 19 12:57
Quote Reply
Re: Disc breaks less than 1w slower [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Soooo little information.
Quote Reply
Re: Disc breaks less than 1w slower [trail] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I guess you must have missed the link at the bottom.

https://www.parcours.cc/pages/aerodynamics_disc
Quote Reply
Re: Disc breaks less than 1w slower [benb] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
benb wrote:
I guess you must have missed the link at the bottom.

Jeez, that was tiny! That provides enough information to start tearing it apart!
Quote Reply
Re: Disc brakes less than 1w slower [benb] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm fairly agnostic on disc vs rim except that I think anyone who want to ride carbon clinchers should be compelled to use disc.

As far as I can see the rim brake wheel tested had 18 spokes and the disc 24 spokes. Implying that the rim optimization gave quite a large advantage to make up for the extra 6 spokes and larger hub.

Aero testing doesn't include the rotational drag - typically about 25-30% of translational drag. So the extra spokes will add on a little extra drag (<0.5W?) relative to rim brake.
Quote Reply