Slowman wrote:
TheStroBro wrote:
Did you read the link? Mattis was summarily dismissed because he didn't agree with Obama's intention for military action with Iran (before the nuke deal where we decided to pay them).
by "summarily dismissed" do you mean that obama replaced him as CENTCOM commander because it became obvious that obama's policy toward iran and mattis's were diametrically opposed? if so, then, i don't understand your point. i don't begrudge trump having the leaders in place that he feels he needs. and i'm also glad in retrospect we didn't bomb the living jeebus out of china in 1951 (i think truman's much more public dismissal of macarthur has stood up well over time; and i wish LBJ had been of like mind about westmoreland).
who all thinks likes the idea of americans in syria? show of hands? no one? and as i wrote somewhere higher up on this thread, i'd be find leaving syria as long as we don't abandon those who fought alongside us. if we had:
1. decided to dislodge ourselves from syria in any kind of orderly way;
2. spoke to our own generals and state dept first, to take their advice;
3. failing that, at least
alert them!
4. advised and alerted our allies in our coalition;
5. had a plan to protect the kurds from the genocide that's likely coming;
6. likewise our other syrian allies;
7. retreated from the battle theater with a plan for rapid tactical return if need be;
then i don't think you and i would have very much to disagree about.
Looks like some of your conditions stated above, are in the works. Seems Trump's bullshit pronouncement back when was just bluster. Bolton came out with a shot across Turkey's bow. This is no shit power playing between Russia and Turkey and the USA. We should see how well Trump's staff handles their red lines in the sand. Maybe we will be lucky and the only casualty will be Gen Mattis.