BarryP wrote:
Observation I read about crossfit (anyone here in the know?): It originally began with a philosophy promoting overall fitness. Over time it has trended more toward strength and away from endurance.
I read this in a book about "hybrid training" which is intended for people who want a true balance of strength and endurance, meant more for special forces (my cousin recommended it to me. Front door second hand brag: he just finished his prelims for the navy seals and got the highest comp score in the nation).
When I was younger I had a 5K PR in the low 15s and a bench press PR of 300 lbs (not at the same time. Best combined was probably around low 16s and 265). In a pro competition that would place me at way the F out into first place by several minutes, and DFLast on any of the lifts.
I can accept Xfit for what it is, and find the concept interesting. I'm just curious about where the balance between different aspects of fitness lies.
Yes, I would agree with you that lately it is trending more toward strength and less about endurance. Just watching the games this year was enough to make that determination. They had a ton of events and some were very much endurance oriented and some were much more strength oriented. The people who win the overall are the people who can finish top 8 in the endurance but can win or come top 3 in the strength. I think the reason is there is just so much more potential to lose time on a heavy lifting workout than on an endurance workout. Yes it would be easy for any endurance athlete to blow most of these guys out of the water on the endurance workouts, but that guy is going to be DFL in anything involving heavy weights or lots of body weight lifting like rope climbs, muscle ups, etc.
The games were extremely varied. They had bike crit racing. Swimming combined with paddle boarding and running. Assault bikes, ski ergs, and box jumps, etc. Those workouts tended to be pretty close, there may have been 1-3 people who were far ahead of the rest of the pack, but those people were way down the list when it came to speed power clean ladders, or the one event that was strictly heavy weight lifting. Matt Frasier has won the last 3 games and he is a pretty built guy who does not win the endurance workouts, but he stays in the top 10 in those workouts. He also doesn't always win the heavier stuff, but he stays top 3-5 in those. That is enough to win the overall so he has trended toward a bit bigger than the athletes used to be. Better to be able to run with the top 10-15 guys than to get on a heavy barbell and totally collapse and take last place in that event.
All that said, I wouldn't say that is the case in a typical CF gym for the average athlete. The big guys move some serious weight, but being fast is still important. I took 2nd in the scaled division of my first CF competition a few weeks ago. A workout buddy of mine took 4th, he can outsquat and outlift me on just about everything, sometimes by a large margin. But I am faster than him on other things and kept him close enough on the lifts so that he took 4th and I took 2nd. The last workout of the day involved a lot of assault bike and the guy who had been sitting in 5-6th place all day suddenly came out of nowhere and won that event, come to find out he is a serious MTB rider, he ended up in 3rd overall even though the guy in 4th could easily outlift him on any lift.