Not wanting to muddy the water of another conversation I have two questions, both out of complete naivety.
Is there no check between the moto and the tent to confirm penalties between course and the tent? Do they not have radios? How long does it take to say.... rider xxx, yellow.... tent 2. At least then when the honest rider shows up to serve at least he can serve the 'allotted' penalty and not be told after the fact you didnt serve enough time. Yes... could still be a fuck up, but at least not a post facto DQ and the debate could continue around race time.... not simply being in the results.
Another, If an athlete is issued a penalty, stops and serves the time only to have after the ref claim it was another infraction after the fact (or the ref claim the rider left early) what is the issue with just adding the time on by the race organizer at the end? If the athlete acknowledged, stopped and served its not like they were trying to really pull one over on people (though I'm sure morally flexible individuals would try and take advantage). Certainly the athlete/ref could have a spirited debate over hey man, you showed me a yellow card, blue card, whatever but at least then its a debate over time, not getting kicked entirely. And.... if relating to the question one above they have radios (with recording) in theory they would have a real-time record of what occurred.
I say/ask both the questions above as someone who has never been issued a penalty, and simply does not know. If someone gets a penalty or a DQ then they should serve or accept it, all shittyness included. I would, and I would be absolutely gutted.
________________________________________________________
Taylor Rogers
2024: IM Hamburg
Is there no check between the moto and the tent to confirm penalties between course and the tent? Do they not have radios? How long does it take to say.... rider xxx, yellow.... tent 2. At least then when the honest rider shows up to serve at least he can serve the 'allotted' penalty and not be told after the fact you didnt serve enough time. Yes... could still be a fuck up, but at least not a post facto DQ and the debate could continue around race time.... not simply being in the results.
Another, If an athlete is issued a penalty, stops and serves the time only to have after the ref claim it was another infraction after the fact (or the ref claim the rider left early) what is the issue with just adding the time on by the race organizer at the end? If the athlete acknowledged, stopped and served its not like they were trying to really pull one over on people (though I'm sure morally flexible individuals would try and take advantage). Certainly the athlete/ref could have a spirited debate over hey man, you showed me a yellow card, blue card, whatever but at least then its a debate over time, not getting kicked entirely. And.... if relating to the question one above they have radios (with recording) in theory they would have a real-time record of what occurred.
I say/ask both the questions above as someone who has never been issued a penalty, and simply does not know. If someone gets a penalty or a DQ then they should serve or accept it, all shittyness included. I would, and I would be absolutely gutted.
________________________________________________________
Taylor Rogers
2024: IM Hamburg