ChasingPB wrote:
Greatzaa wrote:
The whining is so nauseating. The reason there isn't more love is that too many people here are unwilling to acknowledge that they just don't have the talent/work ethic/discipline and need to blame their lack of success on something outside their control
-I'm not rich enough to be fast -I'm not flexible enough to swim fast -I love my family or I would be much faster -If they are better than me, they must be doping Blah, blah, blah, whine, whine, whine I think the whining is more a symptom of not being able to identify with this guy. He's a guy who's been at the top of two major companies and had the means to quit his job and just train. The average AG'er doesn't have the ability to do that, and I think it's hard to look at this as "inspiration," which I think is where people just can't identify with the life this guy is currently living. That said, it's inherently short-sighted to act like he didn't work his ass off to earn those two years and the money he's made. I have to imagine a bit more context behind how he got to where he is might have helped. You don't get to leading Fb/Uber's global growth without an impressive work ethic/backstory, which might have been interesting to get a bit more of a flavor for. Super interesting profile though on a guy who's clearly one of those born with the engine to do this stuff. How relatable are pros who do this full time, and everyone seems to fawn over and identify with them? I think the comment hate or "whining" is because the subject comes across as very irritating to many people, including me, by virtue of how he talks about himself -- especially
on this podcast, if you can even get through that, which I couldn't -- and how highly he seems to think of himself in general. You can tell a lot about a person whose instagram header says "Triathlete (previously at Harvard, Stanford, Facebook, Uber)". For me, that irritation simply drowns out anything I could hear about and learn from his training and it is even more irritating because I don't think he has any sense that he is being irritating -- when I irritate you and make you feel an inch high, it's because I meant to, but Ed Baker seems like a hapless natural.
With all this initiative and smarts and how much he seems to know already with the endurance background, why does Ed Baker need a Purplepatch / Matt Dixon to win the amateur race at an IRONMAN/70.3 event anyways, and why is the fact that he did surprising? After all, I won the amateur race at my first MDot event (beating more than half of the male pros) by coaching myself. A lot of that was based on what I learned about work ethic and discipline as a successful junior executive at Fortune 500 companies, but also because of my running background as a distance runner, first at Blair Academy and then at Penn -- a school I of course chose for academics even though I was a recruited athlete. Now I have a lot more flexibility with my training because I run my own business (part time) making private real estate investments and advising other firms in my space.
See what I did there? How you talk about yourself matters in terms of how people respond to you -- he's getting shit because he is irritating and seems not to know it. This is my complaint about Ed, Dan, though I appreciate the profile.
Also, note: if you can only go 4:29 with an FT of 400 watts, you wasted your money tinkering with helmets and trinkets at A2, because the way your body is fit to that bike makes you efficient as a barn door in the wind. You can see what I mean in his A2 before and after photos. I guess they didn't teach aero at Harvard.