Brownie28 wrote:
big kahuna wrote:
News just coming over the wires that the conservative commentator and pundit of immense rhetorical skill has died. He'd notified all of his impending passage just a couple weeks ago after ending his year-long battle with incurable cancer. https://twitter.com/.../1009918886383357953 Edited to add: The comment stream beneath the WaPo writer's notice is disheartening, to say the least.
I find it interesting how many people feel the need to say 'I didn't agree with his politics but...' - as though simply posting a message of condolence wouldn't work without the caveat that he was a filthy conservative.
He was my dad's favorite political writer, hopefully they're hanging out up there right now.
I hear what you're saying but I don't believe that most folks mention that to discount his opinions. Often, I think it's intended to show greater respect, not less. In other words: "I disagree with him but he was so well thought and reasoned... I feel more informed for his thoughts and am glad I read them." Or, to put in a more common context - sports. When a legendary player dies/retires and fans from rival teams pay respect as deserved. i.e. - "I'm an XYZ fan here. While I hated what this player did on the field against my team. I always respected the way he/she played and wished he/she was on my team". (See retirement of Jason Witten for an example.)