Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Federal Judge slams Kris Kobach on voting law
Quote | Reply
My favorite part of this:

Quote:

The judge also took Mr. Kobach to task for his conduct as a lawyer during the trial, saying that he violated rules “that are designed to prevent prejudice and surprise at trial.”

Mr. Kobach “chose to represent his own office in this matter, and as such, had a duty to familiarize himself with the governing rules of procedure, and to ensure as the lead attorney on this case that his discovery obligations were satisfied despite his many duties as a busy public servant,” Judge Robinson wrote.

On Monday, she ordered that Mr. Kobach be required to complete six hours of legal education. Those six hours “must pertain to federal or Kansas civil rules of procedure or evidence,” she wrote.

----------------------------------
"Go yell at an M&M"
Last edited by: klehner: Jun 19, 18 14:32
Quote Reply
Re: Federal Judge slams Kris Koblach on voting law [klehner] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That's quite amusing.
Quote Reply
Re: Federal Judge slams Kris Koblach on voting law [klehner] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Apparently getting the best people means lawyers that don't know the basics of law.
Quote Reply
Re: Federal Judge slams Kris Koblach on voting law [chaparral] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
chaparral wrote:
Apparently getting the best people means lawyers that don't know the basics of law.


Does he not know them or did he/his staff/whomever play games in discovery? I sincerely don't know, but they're two very different things.

JSA? You have any idea what went on pretrial?

ETA: From the ruling:

“The disclosure violations set forth above document a pattern and practice by Defendant of flaunting disclosure and discovery rules that are designed to prevent prejudice and surprise at trial,” Robinson wrote. “The Court ruled on each disclosure issue as it arose, but given the repeated instances involved, and the fact that Defendant resisted the Court’s rulings by continuing to try to introduce such evidence after exclusion, the Court finds that further sanctions are appropriate.”
“It is not clear to the Court whether Defendant repeatedly failed to meet his disclosure obligations intentionally or due to his unfamiliarity with the federal rules,” the judge added. “Therefore, the Court finds that an additional sanction is appropriate in the form of Continuing Legal Education. Defendant chose to represent his own office in this matter, and as such, had a duty to familiarize himself with the governing rules of procedure, and to ensure as the lead attorney on this case that his discovery obligations were satisfied despite his many duties as a busy public servant.”

War is god
Last edited by: Crank: Jun 19, 18 17:26
Quote Reply